Kasper Eriksen, arrested, shackled, thrown in prison by Trumps gestapo.

motorbiking said:
you claimed:


You claimed you "could not find any evidence", and then said "I most certainly did look". where did you look ? 3rd time asking.

or are you lying again?

It appears you didn't look or know where to look - that is the honest answer isn't. So instead of saying "can you share details, I don't know where to look". You made a dishonest accusation again. why?
Click to expand...
Stop twisting yerself inside out

You made the claim
You provide the evidence.
 
Notch7 said:
I never said that.

Nowhere have I said visa overstayers should not be made to leave.
Click to expand...
you have moaned like hell about ice throwing them out and worse than that people who never even got a visa so no checks made on them whatsoever .
You are a clown
 
Notch7 said:
So 15 of them had valid visas.

So the vast majority of them were legally there.

So the attack could still have happened


Oh dear poor gas112 is looking more silly by the minute


In any case I’ve never said visa overstayers should not be removed, so silly gas112 is trying to argue something I’ve never said. Dopey gasboi
Click to expand...
But you said they were all legal not once but a few times wrong as per usual , notch is a potential terrorists sympathiser thinks they should not be shackled and thrown out the country
 
Notch7 said:
I have no doubt you are laughing your head off at the thought of families being torn apart by Trump



If you think a law abiding citizen who supports the American economy should be treated like that, then you are showing exactly what sort of character you are.
Click to expand...
If he was law abiding he would not be getting thrown out he never followed the process despite having years to do so yet again you are contradicting yourself .. Clown
 
motorbiking said:
You made an dishonest accusation again. why?
Click to expand...
The data doesn’t show what you claim.

Yes I know where to look
Yes I did look
No I don’t need to share that….you made the claim you provide the evidence


oh dear, Motorbiking is still smarting because his false claim of “pushbacks are legal” got totally destroyed.
 
Notch7 said:
Stop twisting yerself inside out

You made the claim
You provide the evidence.
Click to expand...
So you didn't look or know where to look.

No need to tell lies.

You can search every case here: https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac?utf8=✓&search[query]=&search[reported]=all&search[country]=&search[country_guideline]=0&search[judge]=&search[claimant]=

enter the appropriate search term "mental health" "medical problems" etc. DO NOT repost the cases. They may be subject to reporting restrictions.

You will find grim reading.. mental health problems and lack of facilities and services in their home country are one of the most frequent claims made. You will find 100s. Each case costs the tax payer at least £20k

Here is the case law:
www.supremecourt.uk

McDougall and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and another (Respondents) - UK Supreme Court

Was the Court of Appeal correct to dismiss the Appellant’s application?
www.supremecourt.uk www.supremecourt.uk
and here is the case worker guidance.
 
Last edited:
gas112 said:
If he was law abiding he would not be getting thrown out he never followed the process despite having years to do so yet again you are contradicting yourself .. Clown
Click to expand...
He is applying for citizenship, he is not a visa overstayer

He has worked in the USA for over 10 years, lives a fully law abiding life…..supporting the American economy doing a blue collar job.
Failing to comply with a deadline on one item of paperwork doesn’t make him a person of bad intent.

Not once have you provided any evidence that supports him being detained, handcuffed, shackled, thrown in jail.


You are a thoroughly unpleasant nasty person who supports Trump because he is a vindictive bully.
 
motorbiking said:
It amazes me how we in the U.K. grant humanitarian leave to remain for overstayers on the basis that there is no NHS in their home country while others even so called liberal countries chuck people out.

Just recently when in Gothenburg I had to write an email to myself inviting me to a meeting to get through immigration/customs.
Click to expand...

Home Office policy to accept that a claimant’s Article 3 (medical) rights would be breached where there are substantial grounds for believing that they would face a real risk of being exposed to a serious, rapid and irreversible decline in their state of health resulting in intense suffering or a significant (substantial) reduction in life expectancy as a result of the absence of appropriate medical treatment or lack of access to such treatment in the country of return.
Click to expand...
So thats settled then:

U.K. grant humanitarian leave to remain for overstayers on the basis that there is no NHS in their home country

Is FACT
 
motorbiking said:
So you didn't look or know where to look.

No need to tell lies.

You can search every case here: https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac?utf8=✓&search[query]=&search[reported]=all&search[country]=&search[country_guideline]=0&search[judge]=&search[claimant]=

enter the appropriate search term "mental health" "medical problems" etc. DO NOT repost the cases. They may be subject to reporting restrictions.

You will find grim reading.. mental health problems and lack of facilities and services in their home country are one of the most frequent claims made. You will find 100s. Each case costs the tax payer at least £20k

Here is the case law:
www.supremecourt.uk

McDougall and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and another (Respondents) - UK Supreme Court

Was the Court of Appeal correct to dismiss the Appellant’s application?
www.supremecourt.uk www.supremecourt.uk
and here is the case worker guidance.
Click to expand...
How predictable.

You’ve posted a load of bumpf that does not prove what you claim
You are a nasty little liar.

This is what you claimed:

“It amazes me how we in the U.K. grant humanitarian leave to remain for overstayers on the basis that there is no NHS in their home country”

Now show me a quote from your links that support that, you won’t, you can’t because they don’t.
 
Notch7 said:
How predictable.

You’ve posted a load of bumpf that does not prove what you claim
You are a nasty little liar.

This is what you claimed:

“It amazes me how we in the U.K. grant humanitarian leave to remain for overstayers on the basis that there is no NHS in their home country”

Now show me a quote from your links that support that, you won’t, you can’t because they don’t.
Click to expand...
see above and apologise. Why do you do this to yourself. :LOL:
 
Notch7 said:
Mottie supports Reform, is on here frequently saying how great they are……but he can’t name any of their policies

View attachment 383335
Click to expand...
You’re just not getting it, are you? I guess I’ll have just keep repeating it to you as if you were a backward child and hope that one day it clicks.

Mottie said:
All of 'em.
Click to expand...

Feel free to click the link and read them for yourself, I’m not going to waste my time typing out something you could get an adult to read to you.
 
fillyboy said:
True. Just 'illegal'.
Click to expand...
The reality is he has a legal route to remain. So it is strange that he hasn't been treated differently. But based on my own experiences, there are plenty of "liberal" EU countries who do the same. minor breach = deportation, no ifs no buts.

Simply having to renew your passport (getting a different Passport no.) will mean your visa is no longer valid and it can take months to get it updated. If you travel while its pending - you will be in breach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top