Tommy Robinson flees UK

No. see other comments made on the subject.

At the very best, it is a clever use of wording, at worst it is clear deception. Take your pick.
Yep I get it now - like I said earlier- snake like politician
 
Yep I get it now - like I said earlier- snake like politician
You were pushing and pushing for him, hanging onto his words.

Now you've seen why most sensible people don't believe what he says without getting the facts.
 
Nope - only in your mind, I watched the vid that was posted and commented on it -- why dont you have a look at the vid for yourself.
No time for Wayne King, Tommy Robinson, or any other name the criminal wants to use
 
Wikipedia!!! Lol

What a lame response. It is just a simple list of his criminal offences, specifying what he was charged with and the sentence he received. You are happy to believe that the pyramids were built by alien fish people using space lasers. But not a simple chronology of basic facts.
 
What a lame response. It is just a simple list of his criminal offences, specifying what he was charged with and the sentence he received. You are happy to believe that the pyramids were built by alien fish people using space lasers. But not a simple chronology of basic facts.
You do get angry quick dont you and lash out - bit like TR

AS far as I know wiki has not got a very good reputation
 
AS far as I know wiki has not got a very good reputation

You have to be careful about how you make use of Wikipedia. I wouldn't reference it to try to "prove" climate science etc. But it is often good at bringing together lots of basic facts, like in this case. Where else would you find the information all together.
 
What a lame response. It is just a simple list of his criminal offences, specifying what he was charged with and the sentence he received. You are happy to believe that the pyramids were built by alien fish people using space lasers. But not a simple chronology of basic facts.
They were built by Corgis!!!
 
In his more recent quote above, he may be trying to mislead, but without telling an outright lie. He says:



In this case, he was given the choice of Magistrates or a jury trial in the Crown Court. So if I was being exceedingly generous, I might accept that all he is saying is that previously he has never had the opportunity to choose between Magistrates and a jury trial. He has, of course, previously had the opportunity to face a jury in the Crown Court on two occasions, but he chose to plead guilty instead.



That link was to the judgment from his appeal. It ends:



So he was tried and convicted by a jury and his appeal was dismissed.
What a lame response. It is just a simple list of his criminal offences, specifying what he was charged with and the sentence he received. You are happy to believe that the pyramids were built by alien fish people using space lasers. But not a simple chronology of basic facts.

let me help
 
Back
Top