- Joined
- 25 Apr 2023
- Messages
- 9,313
- Reaction score
- 6,392
- Country

Whoever put pineapple on gammon first was a genius, must have been Rupert Lowe as he is the king of gammon?Always both!! And two eggs.
Probably my all time favourite!


Whoever put pineapple on gammon first was a genius, must have been Rupert Lowe as he is the king of gammon?Always both!! And two eggs.
Probably my all time favourite!
Happy to be disproved but that sounds like Borris’s bendy banana fantasyThey only really need to amend Article 8. That is the one that gets all the headlines about not having the right chicken nuggets etc. in other countries.
Happy to be disproved but that sounds like Borris’s bendy banana fantasy
Little to do with nuggets as far as I can see, more about separation from his son.That was the headline anyway in the Independent:
![]()
Criminal’s deportation case halted over son’s dislike for chicken nuggets
A tribunal ruled it would be ‘unduly harsh’ for the 10-year-old son to return to Albania owing to food sensitivitieswww.independent.co.uk
That's another excuse regularly trotted out - deportation of (usually) the father will separate the family. The solution is obvious to everybody but the judges - deport the whole family.Little to do with nuggets as far as I can see, more about separation from his son.

His wife is British as are their two children, I don't think they could be forced to leave.That's another excuse regularly trotted out - deportation of (usually) the father will separate the family. The solution is obvious to everybody but the judges - deport the whole family.
Rupert Lowe went to Radley college, where fees are £20,000 per term.
He has zero interest in improving the lives of ordinary British citizens.
Why stop there, why not go back several generations, or apply it to those who hold dual citizenship, or even reintroduce transportation. Do a Trumpf and declare that Australia is still ours.That's another excuse regularly trotted out - deportation of (usually) the father will separate the family. The solution is obvious to everybody but the judges - deport the whole family.
OK, not deport the rest of the family, but if they're concerned about separation they're free to go with him.That's another excuse regularly trotted out - deportation of (usually) the father will separate the family. The solution is obvious to everybody but the judges - deport the whole family.

Agreed, the Government appealed the decision.OK, not deport the rest of the family, but if they're concerned about separation they're free to go with him.

I suspect they didn't get their passport stamped on the way in.So they can 'flee' to a country and not claim asylum? What’s the point? What happens to them? Presumably, some of these migrants exceed their 90 day limit for being in the EU. If, for example, a Brit exceeded their 90 day limit in the EU, could they just say they were thinking of claiming asylum but are not doing it yet?

So the solution isn't obvious after all, even to you .OK, not deport the rest of the family, but if they're concerned about separation they're free to go with him.
That's what I saidNo problem with deporting him, and if his family want to go to, then off they go.
His parents should ask for a refund.Rupert Lowe went to Radley college, where fees are £20,000 per term.