Lucy Connolly to be freed

Nonsense. No lies there boyo.
You’ll be able to show that I called referring to someone with sunburn a lobster as racist. The term gammon on the other hand is a racist derogatory slur.

You won’t get away with your lies and deflection Boyo
 
I never said you did.
It would be mental to believe calling a sunburnt person a lobster is racist. It’s MBK that’s mental boyo, not me.
You can’t help lying. It seems.
Always.
It’s not racist though as you have stated on here.
A derogatory slur about someone’s skin colour that is not a result of sunburn. Isn’t racism, you say.

Here’s a little test for you. can you think of any derogatory slurs about black or brown people’s skin colour that doesn’t sound racist to you?
 
You can’t help lying. It seems.

A derogatory slur about someone’s skin colour that is not a result of sunburn. Isn’t racism, you say.

Here’s a little test for you. can you think of any derogatory slurs about black or brown people’s skin colour that doesn’t sound racist to you?

Berk
 
It has been clear from day one that Lucy Connolly's sentence was politically influenced.

Lucy states in the below interview that early in the case her solicitor told her: "They are not playing by the rules with these cases"; "I have never seen anything like this before" and "You should never have been placed on remand". That solicitor should now be brought to book. Who were the "they" that were not playing by the rules? What rules were being bent or broken?

(Watch just the couple of minutes starting at 11 mins 28)

 
Last edited:
It has been clear from day one that Lucy Connolly's sentence was politically influenced. Lucy states in the below interview that early in the case her solicitor told her: "They are not playing by the rules with these cases"; "I have never seen anything like this before" and "You should never have been placed on remand". That solicitor should now be brought to book. Who were the "they" that were not playing by the rules? What rules were being bent or broken?

(Watch from 11 mins 28)

TL.DNW.
 
It has been clear from day one that Lucy Connolly's sentence was politically influenced.

Lucy states in the below interview that early in the case her solicitor told her: "They are not playing by the rules with these cases"; "I have never seen anything like this before" and "You should never have been placed on remand". That solicitor should now be brought to book. Who were the "they" that were not playing by the rules? What rules were being bent or broken?

(Watch just the couple of minutes starting at 11 mins 28)


The more I read opinion from criminal barristers, the more I am feeling there might be mileage in this opinion.

However, advising a client to confess to a serious crime when they need to prove intent, was bad advice.
Can’t think of one? Thought so.
 
Going crimson with ire while reading the Wail is optional (y)

Berk.
Only a nutter (or someone with dementia) would think the term gammon racist.

The poor old sod forgets they are just as white as my ass.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top