A 22-year-old Afghan national.

As you say they should be deported, regardless how dangerous their country is.
Think about how some could turn up on our shores, with no details, no ID, no money, no medical history, no psychiatric history, no criminal history etc, and be allowed to roam the streets unsupervised is utterly insane, isn't it?

I wonder what the far lefties are going to say about this one.
 
Who's defending him, them ?
Yep there was plenty of defending going on yesterday when I posted about it
Here is knave himmy john what ever its name is doing its best to put up a defence - this went on for about 5 pages.
As i said, he's arrived some time ago, but not by boat, and was not an asylum seeker.
Yet you still eagerly grasped the opportunity to post it in a thread about small boat arrivals.
You're reinforcing your reputation for fomenting hatred against foreigners.
 
Pete was taking the piz because that is what the usual suspects on here always say - they give a giant - yeh but no but
Thank god you said that, people might think I'm as mental as the others :oops:
 
Who’s defending him ?
Right look at all of this not defending him - this was from yesterday after I posted up the news link about it


Some people are determined to stir up trouble. :rolleyes:

You've just demonstrated how you jump to conclusions based on what you want to believe. :rolleyes:

Not an asylum seeker, not a small boat arrival. much to aveatry's disappointment. :rolleyes:
it really spoiled his opportunism. :ROFLMAO:

Aveatry posted a news item about a 22 year old attacker, who is not an asylum seeker, nor arrived in a boat.

Where is this proof that the 22 year old attacker was an asylum seeker. I haven't seen it.

Your supposed proof that that the 22 year old attacker was an asylum seeker appears to exist only in your head. :rolleyes:

WHere is the evidence that he's an asylum seeker that arrived in a lorry?
I haven't seen it. I've only seen your unsupported claim.

But it makes no difference. The thread is about small boat arrivals.
The attacker arrived 5 years ago, and was an asylum seeker. He had been granted asylum.

Yes. The thread is about the current situation, asylum seekers arriving by boat.
Do you perceive the difference?

Yes, I've now seen it. But the attacker was no longer an asylum seeker, and he didn't arrive by boat. :rolleyes:
But you still grasped the opportunity to foment hatred and division against foreigners.

As i said, he's arrived some time ago, but not by boat, and was not an asylum seeker.
Yet you still eagerly grasped the opportunity to post it in a thread about small boat arrivals.
You're reinforcing your reputation for fomenting hatred against foreigners.

As I said, despite your claim, the attacker is not an asylum seeker.
The convicted rapist in Scotland is an asylum seeker and will be deported after serving his sentence.
I think it is you that is confused.

He was granted asylum. He's no longer seeking asylum because he's already been granted it. :rolleyes:

He was not an asylum seeker yesterday or today. he was granted asylum 3 years ago.
That means he was no longer seeking it. :rolleyes:
He didn't arrive by boat, but you posted it in a thread about small boat arrivals.
There can be only one explanation for why you posted it, to foment hatred against foreigners and especially asylum seekers, or former asylum seekers.

Yeah, let's foment hatred against someone that had settled in UK, on the basis that they were an asylum seeker some years ago.
And let's post that hatred in a totally irrelevant thread because you know that's where it will have maximum impact in fomenting hatred. :rolleyes:

I see your sad attempt at fomenting hatred against foreigners, and I don't need any medical assistance to see that.
The article was about a former asylum seeker, had settled in UK, who did not arrive by boat, and has allegedly committed a crime.
So you post it in a thread where you knew it would have maximum impact in achieving what you wanted to achieve, i.e. to foment hatred.

I'm not discussing the alleged crime. I'm highlighting your motive for posting an alleged crime by a foreigner.

if they attacker had been caucasian, you wouldn't have presented the article because it wouldn't have had effect that you desire.
if you'd want to discuss the crime, why pick on that incident, why post it in the small boat arrivals, and why choose a non-asylum seeker who arrived by lorry, not boat?
 
Who’s defending him ?
What relevance is his nationality ?
it is important to know the full details of who is committing crimes and the types of crimes they are committing - how else can policy be correctly aimed? how else can we determine risk and avoid danger?

there seems to be a disproportional amount of very serious crimes committed by migrants, how disproportional we don't know as the figures are hidden. Why are the figures hidden ? If those figures categorically showed migrants committed less crimes on a pro rata basis then they would be shouting it from the roof tops.

Jeneriks claims that “Afghans and Eritreans are more than 20 times more likely to be convicted of sexual offences than British citizens” were said to be made up nonsense - so why were the real figures not published then to prove him wrong ? I'm sure Jenerik exaggerated a bit, but if he was so widely out then show us the real figures
 
That fruit cake that was deported back to Ethiopia apparently kicked off and refused to get on the plane

They had to bung him £500 as an incentive :giggle:

Incentive should be a tazor
Hand cuffs
Ankle cuffs
Straight jacket

And a smack

If he refuses to board the plane
 
Back
Top