Why are we arguing about the law he was arrested and released with no charge.
Bus driver sacked OMG
- Thread starter pete01
- Start date
I have been 'there' since the first time I posted it way back when.
..as per.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,692
- Reaction score
- 9,412
- Country
We aren't, it is nosenowt now thinking he knows more about the law than MBK, it's funny.
Because MBK always gets it wrong - then runs around like a headless chicken (apt) for a few dozen pages - then you hear the head slap (post# 132).
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,004
- Reaction score
- 5,900
- Country
Because MBK always gets it wrong - then runs around like a headless chicken (apt) for a few dozen pages - then you hear the head slap (post# 132).
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,004
- Reaction score
- 5,900
- Country
I know.. next time I need to hire lawyers for my team, I’ll go to Travis Perkins.It's hilarious considering I'm just a builder.
See post # 126 and CB response.
You’re good entertainment, I’ll give you that.
How are you getting on with the case law?
Obviously he is.
He did the same when he falsely pretended to have seen an admission in a press release
He couldn't provide a link to it
Because it didn't exist.
I suppose he thinks people are dumb enough to assume he is telling the truth.
The Criminal Law Act 1967 does not give you a blanket right to chase a fleeing suspect with a weapon. While Section 3 of the Act allows for the use of "reasonable force" to prevent crime or make a lawful arrest, using a weapon against a fleeing person is extremely likely to be deemed disproportionate, excessive, and illegal.
Have you seen who follows him about like a lap dog, thwanking him for his false statements, lies and bullsít?
Nuff said.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,004
- Reaction score
- 5,900
- Country
Is this statute, guidance, case law?The Criminal Law Act 1967 does not give you a blanket right to chase a fleeing suspect with a weapon. While Section 3 of the Act allows for the use of "reasonable force" to prevent crime or make a lawful arrest, using a weapon against a fleeing person is extremely likely to be deemed disproportionate, excessive, and illegal.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,004
- Reaction score
- 5,900
- Country
You and troll mod could form a study group.
You could invent your own law, rather than learning about it.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,692
- Reaction score
- 9,412
- Country
Well more handyman tbh.
The Legal Position (Criminal Law Act 1967)
- Reasonable Force Only: Section 3(1) states: "A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders...".
- Proportionality is Key: The force used must match the threat. If a suspect is running away, they are generally not an immediate threat to you or others. Chasing them with a weapon implies a desire to harm or punish (revenge), rather than to stop a crime.
- Grossly Disproportionate Force: If you chase a suspect and use a weapon—especially if you cause serious injury—it will almost certainly be considered "grossly disproportionate," and you may face criminal charges, including wounding or assault, regardless of the fact that they stole from you.
Very.
