- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,737
- Reaction score
- 9,437
- Country
I rest my case.TRanslation - MBK is losing badly and H-man is throwing in the towel.
Bus driver sacked OMG
- Thread starter pete01
- Start date
Because chasing people down the streets in a helicopter will be just downright dangerous!
Be sensible....
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,737
- Reaction score
- 9,437
- Country
Chicken biker will be thankful.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,068
- Reaction score
- 5,938
- Country
Nope its not there - liar liar pants on fire.
As I said, get a grown up to read it.
Must admit I just had a quick skim and couldn't see it.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,068
- Reaction score
- 5,938
- Country
Last edited:
Yes that's the page. I have posted the link 26 times. The snippet is under the heading "what if I chase them after they have run off". It is quite clear and succinct. I haven't altered their words.
Here are the rest of the facts that tally with the CPS stuff, some of it as you know I posted prior..
The Criminal Law Act 1967 does not give you a blanket right to chase a fleeing suspect with a weapon. While Section 3 of the Act allows for the use of "reasonable force" to prevent crime or make a lawful arrest, using a weapon against a fleeing person is extremely likely to be deemed disproportionate, excessive, and illegal.
The Legal Position (Criminal Law Act 1967)
- Reasonable Force Only: Section 3(1) states: "A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders...".
- Proportionality is Key: The force used must match the threat. If a suspect is running away, they are generally not an immediate threat to you or others. Chasing them with a weapon implies a desire to harm or punish (revenge), rather than to stop a crime.
- Grossly Disproportionate Force: If you chase a suspect and use a weapon—especially if you cause serious injury—it will almost certainly be considered "grossly disproportionate," and you may face criminal charges, including wounding or assault, regardless of the fact that they stole from you.
This situation is different as you are no longer acting in self-defence and so the same degree of force may not be reasonable. However, you are still allowed to use reasonable force to recover your property and make a citizen's arrest. You should consider your own safety and, for example, whether the police have been called. A rugby tackle or a single blow would probably be reasonable. Acting out of malice and revenge with the intent of inflicting punishment through injury or death would not.
Chasing a fleeing suspect with a weapon and subsequently using it is highly likely to be considered malice, revenge, or retaliation rather than self-defence in legal terms, particularly if the initial threat has passed.
(Source - CPS)
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,737
- Reaction score
- 9,437
- Country
lock the thread as MBK has won the case. (about 30 pages ago)
He's drowning in his own failures, poor old sod.
Did you report Odds by the way? last I looked his insult was still there.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,068
- Reaction score
- 5,938
- Country
you have claimed this:
The Criminal Law Act 1967 does not give you a blanket right to chase a fleeing suspect with a weapon. While Section 3 of the Act allows for the use of "reasonable force" to prevent crime or make a lawful arrest, using a weapon against a fleeing person is extremely likely to be deemed disproportionate, excessive, and illegal.
The Legal Position (Criminal Law Act 1967)
What if I chase them as they run off?
- Reasonable Force Only: Section 3(1) states: "A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders...".
- Proportionality is Key: The force used must match the threat. If a suspect is running away, they are generally not an immediate threat to you or others. Chasing them with a weapon implies a desire to harm or punish (revenge), rather than to stop a crime.
- Grossly Disproportionate Force: If you chase a suspect and use a weapon—especially if you cause serious injury—it will almost certainly be considered "grossly disproportionate," and you may face criminal charges, including wounding or assault, regardless of the fact that they stole from you.
This situation is different as you are no longer acting in self-defence and so the same degree of force may not be reasonable. However, you are still allowed to use reasonable force to recover your property and make a citizen's arrest. You should consider your own safety and, for example, whether the police have been called. A rugby tackle or a single blow would probably be reasonable. Acting out of malice and revenge with the intent of inflicting punishment through injury or death would not.
Chasing a fleeing suspect with a weapon and subsequently using it is highly likely to be considered malice, revenge, or retaliation rather than self-defence in legal terms, particularly if the initial threat has passed.
(Source - CPS)
is source from page 4 of this https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN02959/SN02959.pdf
Its a complete lie.
Grow up.
