'UK has been colonised by immigrants'

I would agree with Ratcliffe, we are slowly but surely being colonised by mass inward immigration.
Immigration which increased after brexit, which he championed as being the way to do the opposite!
 
I suspect you were very happy with Brit's colonising other parts of the world?
and on that score how well did the indigenous people do ?
history would tell us that mass invasion and colonisation is terrible for the original inhabitants - so if you don't mind I will argue not to have my life or my children’s ruined bu mass inward immigration.
 
In the interview, Britain’s seventh-richest man, who moved to tax-free Monaco in 2020, said “You can’t afford … you can’t have an economy with 9 million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in,” he said. “The UK is being colonised by immigrants, really, isn’t it? I mean, the population of the UK was 58 million in 2020, now it’s 70 million. That’s 12 million people.”

Figures from the Office for National Statistics indicate Ratcliffe’s claim is incorrect. The ONS estimated that the population of the UK was 67 million in 2020 and was last anywhere close to 58 million in 2000.
---
First the Glazers now this MAGA-lite muppet - United are cursed with these fat cat f.wits.
 
and on that score how well did the indigenous people do ?
history would tell us that mass invasion and colonisation is terrible for the original inhabitants - so if you don't mind I will argue not to have my life or my children’s ruined bu mass inward immigration.

Did you have a period of history in mind?
The Romans, perhaps, or the Normans. The Angles and Saxons, maybe?
 
Did you have a period of history in mind?
The Romans, perhaps, or the Normans. The Angles and Saxons, maybe?
all of those - also think what happened to the native americans (Indians)

and yes I know we are the descendants of vikings and Normans and .... 1000+ years ago. But why would that fact make me want to be colonised by others ? Like any indigenous group there is nothing wrong in wanting to keep what we have built
 
We need immigration.

As an aside, anyone who thinks we should have zero immigration is as best misinformed.

However, as we keep saying, what we need is controlled immigration. Oh, and a MUCH more effective system of dealing with those who come in illegally.

I still don't think Labour fully realises the depth of frustration and anger across much of the electorate when it comes to things like the small boats. It's fine to spout stats e.g. 'they only account for a very small percentage of the overall numbers' when are they going to realise it's the optics of it all that doesn't play well.

As for Jim's comments, I suppose one could assert we are being gradually colonised, however I struggle to see that even with the numbers we see coming in. And if we are being colonised, maybe it's karma?
 
all of those - also think what happened to the native americans (Indians)

and yes I know we are the descendants of vikings and Normans and .... 1000+ years ago. But why would that fact make me want to be colonised by others ? Like any indigenous group there is nothing wrong in wanting to keep what we have built
It used to be said the Norse replaced the indigenous Britons when they invaded but subsequent research into archaeological discoveries, and the advances in dna testing, reveal the story isn't so straightforward. Thier migration was forced by a need for farmland which the British Isles had in abundance compared to Norway, for instance, and modern migrants are looking for similar opportunities, albeit in an urban cityscape.

There is no research to suggest they're looking to 'replace' anybody.
 
Irrelevant of his estimation of the U.K. population, vs official statistics, which of course excludes those living here illegally.. our welfare bill in increasing rapidly, by about 10% a year and it’s not just due to pensions.

There is also some evidence that foreign born take a greater share of benefits than “home” born. Not a huge amount, but enough to dispel the myth that immigrants are more financially productive. In fact if you take account of earnings required for visas, the difference is probably greater.
 
Irrelevant of his estimation of the U.K. population, vs official statistics, which of course excludes those living here illegally.. our welfare bill in increasing rapidly, by about 10% a year and it’s not just due to pensions.

There is also some evidence that foreign born take a greater share of benefits than “home” born. Not a huge amount, but enough to dispel the myth that immigrants are more financially productive. In fact if you take account of earnings required for visas, the difference is probably greater.
show your source.
 
I suppose one could assert we are being gradually colonised, however I struggle to see that even with the numbers we see coming in.
Trouble is, certain ethnicities don’t integrate. They form their own little colonies and push others out. That pysses people off.

"In short, European nations took the line of least resistance by privileging immigrant communities with the freedom to preserve their unique cultures in lieu of assimilation. But this was done with insufficient strategic thought on the longer-term implications. The formation of enclaves accentuated the challenges of integrating the immigrants because they lived not as a part of their host societies but perpetually apart from them".

 
Last edited:
Ratty should stick to what he’s bad at, running a football club. He’s been successful with processes but seems clueless about people. Look at his made by a committee Inneos fake Land Rover.
 
We need immigration.

As an aside, anyone who thinks we should have zero immigration is as best misinformed.
Very true

"The UK economy would be 3.6% smaller by 2040 if net migration fell to zero, forcing the government to raise taxes to combat a much bigger budget deficit, a thinktank has predicted"

"Jump of £37bn in budget deficit by 2040 would force government to increase taxes, NIESR predicts"

Link

Unsurprisingly those that moan the loudest at tax rises also ignore the £90bn a year we are losing because of brexit...

They of course tend to be supporters of the biggest economic/social suicide note in history!
 
The UK economy would be 3.6% smaller by 2040 if net migration fell to zero, forcing the government to raise taxes to combat a much bigger budget deficit, a thinktank has predicted"
A 'think-tank' can come up with whatever conclusion you want it to, depending on the opinions of those 'experts' in said 'think-tank'. I saw it all the time when I was working in the charity education business.

Would you accept the conclusion of a 'think-tank' formed of Reform members?
 
Back
Top