The differences/discrepancies, although not enormous, are far too large to be the result of any credible rounding.I would assume rounding up or down.
The differences/discrepancies, although not enormous, are far too large to be the result of any credible rounding.I would assume rounding up or down.

you can get any old carp from china with fake European ce [china export ]so buyer beware to do the type testing which off course they wontIt seems some info logged local, and some goes to a server in China. But close enough to what the smart meter says not to worry about it.
I have seen so many reports about a law change to allow plug and play solar, but still no one has said what law stops us using it.


... fake European ce [china export ] ...
where as any uk based company cant sell any product that doesnt comply with relevant standards or regulations
Are you saying that some of the figures you're being provided with are incorrect?It seems some info logged local, and some goes to a server in China. But close enough to what the smart meter says not to worry about it.
It would presumably be fairly trivial to increase the 'panel angle' to something closer to optimum?In my garden I have an outbuilding which is oriented basically E-W, with a pitched roof, so one face of that is pretty much south facing. 19m² and virtually unshaded. Angle is less than ideal, about 10°, but overall quite a useful space, and being single storey easy to access.
That presumably depends upon the amount of one's demand during the hours of daylight, particularly in Summer. If demand were large enough to exceed a modest amount of PV generation, then there would be nothing to export. One would, of course (as with everything to do with such technologies) wait quite a long time before one got to the financial break-even point but, ultimately, if one was still alive and the equipment still working, one would thereafter enjoy an increasingly low price for the electricity one had generated and used.But with no export earning not much point
True.... and battery payback time is a bit long.

My slopping roof is east and west, and when the installers came, they first said some panels on each roof, this would increase the time I get solar for, but decrease the peak output, but it seems they ran it through their computer, and it said west only would be better. And to be frank they were correct, the off-peak is not even spread either side of midnight, but is all in the morning, so does not stop until 05:30, and by 6:30 I am today getting solar, OK only 70 watt, but the battery still at 92% charged, so don't need much for solar, by 07:30 getting 200 watt, so battery no longer discharging any great amount, so the state of charge steady at 87% yesterday by 10:10 battery back at 100%.In my garden I have an outbuilding which is oriented basically E-W, with a pitched roof, so one face of that is pretty much south facing. 19m² and virtually unshaded. Angle is less than ideal, about 10°, but overall quite a useful space, and being single storey easy to access.
But with no export earning not much point, and battery payback time is a bit long.
means one could not run a washing machine to run on solar without a battery filling the gaps. The trough was down to 656 watts, and this from a 6 kW array, the peak was 5.7 kW yesterday would not hold at that for long, as inverter rated at 5 kW, but to use the solar, you need one of three things. A) Less solar than homes base load. B) A battery. C) Payment for export.
It must be installed, and plug and play is not installed.no person shall install or operate a source of energy which may be connected in parallel with a distributor’s network unless he (d)agrees specific requirements with the distributor who owns or operates the network.
It says "install or operate" - does not 'operating' include 'plugging in'?It seems The Electricity Safety, Quality and Continuity Regulations 2002 is reason not permitted, it says It must be installed, and plug and play is not installed.

I asked what law stops them being used on another forum, and got the answer here it seems law wise it is a civil law not statute, and is down to the agreement one signs to get a grid supply in the main.It says "install or operate" - does not 'operating' include 'plugging in'?
ESQCR is a Statutory Instrument ( SI 2002 No 2665).I asked what law stops them being used on another forum, and got the answer here it seems law wise it is a civil law not statute
I suppose that's true but, in the real-world, is it 'ever' going to happen that there are absolutely no significant loads on the entirety of a local network?There is the need to avoid solar islanding when the network supply fails or is turned OFF
........ In worst case where there is no load on the network then all plug in generators will see the 230 V on the nework and will not shut down.

As far as I am aware, under or over voltage will cause a shut-down, and so will out of frequency range. I would have thought there is a minium time that supply must be restored to allow inverters to grid tie again, and it should not matter if solar is installed or plugged in, the disconnection/reconnection criteria should be the same.I suppose that's true but, in the real-world, is it 'ever' going to happen that there are absolutely no significant loads on the entirety of a local network?
it has a 13 amp plug and a 300 watt inverter, but a 2 kW inverter would be clearly better.If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local