Why's Starmer still the PM?

So if someone who is from an ethnic minority supports them, then they are in my opinion either naive, or blissfully ignorant.
I don't think I'd agree with you on that. Many immigrants, first, second or subsequent generations, have the "pull up the drawbridge" attitude.
Whether that is motivated by a desire to be accepted by indigenous people, or the acceptance that UK is full up, or the typical blaming of immigrants for one's lack of progress in society, or an annoyance at irregular arrivals, is hard to say.
So yes, perhaps naive or ignorant because they've been duped into accepting he misnomer of illegal immigrant to describe asylum seekers.
When I say irregular arrivals, I'm referring to asylum seekers, which the far-right regular describe as illegal immigrants, which of course is the misnomer. But everyone who doesn't bother to look up the proper definitions of illegal immigrants and asylum seeker, would be easily fooled into assuming that all asylum seekers are illegal immigrants, such is the use of the misnomer, and thus their dislike of them, especially when many or even most non-white settled immigrants arrived via regular routes.
 
We have corrupt politicians from all sides. We also have mass immigration coming into a country where Ai will take most jobs.
Massive dept.

We have a problem, a big problem. It needs sorting out.

If you think additional migrants is going to help sort out thid mess, then you deluded.
have i said that?:unsure:
 
We have corrupt politicians from all sides. We also have mass immigration coming into a country where Ai will take most jobs.
Massive dept.

We have a problem, a big problem. It needs sorting out.

If you think additional migrants is going to help sort out thid mess, then you deluded.
AI will never meet the vacancies in the care, medical and hospitality industry, where the immigrants fill most vacancies.
 
Many immigrants, first, second or subsequent generations, have the "pull up the drawbridge" attitude. Whether that is motivated by a desire to be accepted by indigenous people, or the acceptance that UK is full up, or the typical blaming of immigrants for one's lack of progress in society, or an annoyance at irregular arrivals, is hard to say.
Maybe it's because the high majority of them (close to all of them I'd imagine) came in through legal routes and have worked and contributed for years or decades. They respect the UK and what it stands for. What they see now is folk coming in through dubious routes and getting kept by hardworking taxpayers.
 
The fact is (nothing to do with anyone's ideology), that many Reform members are racist. It's pretty obvious Farage himself is racist. Reform are proudly anti-Islam and anti-immigration, especially if said immigrants have brown skin. So if someone who is from an ethnic minority supports them, then they are in my opinion either naive, or blissfully ignorant.

You have to do some pretty spectacular mental gymnastics to think I am racist.
100% garbage.

The Left's standard weapon is to silence all opposing voices using accusations of racism, sexism, whateverism they can thinkofism.

It's just what communist regimes have always done.
 
I see Farage as a blatant con-man in a political party full of lying and cheating ex-Brexiteer Tories who are trying to manipulate people into voting for them by conning them into believing immigration is making them poorer, but in actual fact they are poorer because of the things the con-men have campaigned for.
Tin foil hat nonsense.

There's no giant conspiracy. Just a majority of people who don't agree with your ideology.

Democracy knows better than any one individual. Accept the outcome.
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's because the high majority of them (close to all of them I'd imagine) came in through legal routes and have worked and contributed for years or decades. They respect the UK and what it stands for. What they see now is folk coming in through dubious routes and getting kept by hardworking taxpayers.
Most came in when we had heavy industry and a post-war shortage of working age men.

We welcomed them in because we needed workers. We were actually acting in our own self-interest, we weren't being charitable. It was a win-win for everyone.

Now we have little industry, a surplus of unskilled people already living here and a massive housing shortage. It makes absolutely no sense to bring in more and make our problems worse.

Many don't even intend to work, they just want to take from us.
 
Maybe it's because the high majority of them (close to all of them I'd imagine) came in through legal routes and have worked and contributed for years or decades. They respect the UK and what it stands for. What they see now is folk coming in through dubious routes and getting kept by hardworking taxpayers.
Which is what I addressed:
I don't think I'd agree with you on that. Many immigrants, first, second or subsequent generations, have the "pull up the drawbridge" attitude.
Whether that is motivated by a desire to be accepted by indigenous people, or the acceptance that UK is full up, or the typical blaming of immigrants for one's lack of progress in society, or an annoyance at irregular arrivals, is hard to say.
So yes, perhaps naive or ignorant because they've been duped into accepting he misnomer of illegal immigrant to describe asylum seekers.
When I say irregular arrivals, I'm referring to asylum seekers, which the far-right regular describe as illegal immigrants, which of course is the misnomer. But everyone who doesn't bother to look up the proper definitions of illegal immigrants and asylum seeker, would be easily fooled into assuming that all asylum seekers are illegal immigrants, such is the use of the misnomer, and thus their dislike of them, especially when many or even most non-white settled immigrants arrived via regular routes.
 
Any statistician does.

Almost all anti-social behaviour is disproportionally very high among our new culturally enriching friends in comparison to the native population.

Just facts, not opinions.
Have you checked your reference to actual statistics? (Daft question, I know)
But I don't suppose you'd be interested in doing that.
 
Back
Top