Burnham the new PM

When, in your world is something you disagree with, or disagrees with you, not "trolling"?
Yes you do seem to have difficulty with that.

Not trolling, is relevant, , not a straw man argument, not just mouthing off because the poster feels he's important and has a need to say something , when it's not something like "oh but it might not be", when it's not a whataboutery comment, when it's not a dumb ad-hom comment, etc etc etc.
Many of your posts do fall in to those categories.
 
es, and one of the major differences is that a nation's finances can be affected by government policy.
They can raise additional taxes either by raising the rates of tax or introducing new taxes. Householders can not simply raise their prices of their products. When a government raises tax rates or introduces new taxes, the population cannot 'shop' elsewhere for their goods or services, or refuse to pay.
A householder cannot simply increase the supply of their money to meet shortfalls or to raise productivity, or to make their products and services relatively cheaper.
If a householder wishes to reduce consumption by reducing food to their family, they can because they're not up for election in the near future.
A government is a democratic organisation and if their supporters desert them they're out on their ear.

All of the above are differences. There's many more differences which shows that comparing a nation's finances to a housholder balancing the books is a non-starter.
You're tell me that my knowledge is "sadly lacking" , expressing your view that being a mayor is comparable wth running a country, I point out differences that I'd said before. and now you're agreeing with me.
Trolling - trying to find a criticism just because you feel the need to say something, when you haven't got anything to say. In your case, losing the thread altogether but carrying on rambling in circles.

I used "running a house and farm" as a comparator, not as a descriptor. I think that's pretty obvious and simple to understand but you've taken it as a hook to troll about because that's what you do, as a prominent forum troll.
 
You appear to be the one having difficulty with what was said because you failed to answer the question. :rolleyes:


Got an example?

There's an example of your that fits the bill:

:rolleyes:
You're doing it again. This is off-topic, irrelevant junk . Stop posting off-topic irrelevant junk.

There isn't a question. Except, "why are you constantly posting off-topic irrelevant junk?"
Answer - because you like trolling.
Morqy did ask what I considered trolling and I have answered it. And so have you - by providing more of it.

You both quite often get it removed, I have noticed.
 
You're doing it again. This is off-topic, irrelevant junk . Stop posting off-topic irrelevant junk.

There isn't a question. Except, "why are you constantly posting off-topic irrelevant junk?"
Answer - because you like trolling.
Morqy did ask what I considered trolling and I have answered it. And so have you - by providing more of it.

You both quite often get it removed, I have noticed.
Ignore him her mate he just feeds off baiting people. Utter waste of your life.
 
Morqthana and I are in agreement, an alternative opinion is definitely not trolling. It's simply an alternative opinion.
Because you don't like alternative opinions to yours, you accuse your opponent of trolling.
You have a serious problem with comprehension, debate, alternative opinions and the definition of trolling. :rolleyes:
You have a problem reading. When someone writes something, you go off on an irrelevant non argument of no value to anyone just because you think you must, for whatever reason. You are NOT expressing a different opinion, you are not debating, you are just writing rubbish. Constantly.
It isn't debating a topic, if you set off about something different, which has no bearing on the logic of the topic.
I think you have a problem imagining that something which pops up in your head isn't the most important thing in the world, so you write it whether it's sensible or not.
I repeat - I cited differences between running a town and a country, you said no . You were wrong, there are differences. But you have to be a troll and try to nit pick, and write silliness, then you agreed with me.
These are repeated characteristics of a jerk.
Reported.
 
Another that can't debate so resorts to the inappropriate accusation of trolling.
Try debating. It's much more enjoyment than your typical ad hom comments. :rolleyes:
It isn't "not debating" to decline to be provoked by your interminable stupid comments.
Check the expression "feeding the troll".
 
Back on topic... just 9 freedom days remain before King Andy becomes our unelected supreme leader.

Make the most of it, life may never be the same again.

There's still time to get savings offshore.
 
Back on topic... just 9 freedom days remain before King Andy becomes our unelected supreme leader.

Make the most of it, life may never be the same again.

There's still time to get savings offshore.
Oh the drama!

What with your hero scrabbling around looking for his dignity in the gutter and Comrade Burnham about to take the helm, you must be distraught, poor luv.
 
Yep all the amateur lefties were crying when Richy rich took the helm such hypocrisy. They are cheering this guy in and parting like the sea for moses to allow him to rule our country without any credibility I say that in the most unbiased way possible as I am struggling to recollect a pm from any side actually properly vetted to be qualified to run out country.

He will be no better and if worse trying to appease his northern friends he's also struck deals with to make this happen. Can't wait for the honeymoon haze to condensate and obscure his 'vision' which will only ever please some of the people, and I would guess that number is pretty small.

For now at least he has the backing of the corrupt media corps Sky BBc etc..
 
Back
Top