UFOs

The things not on earth are confounding the scientists.
Using the James Webb scope, we can look back to relatively close to the time of the Big Bang.
Scientists are pretty sure how long ago that was - there are about 4 ways to measure it, and they agree.

Buggeration is, that what we see is far more galaxies than we can explain out there/back then, and each would have taken far longer than the time they had, to form, according to our understanding.
They shouldn't be there.
So either we're wrong about the age of the universe , which throws our entire understanding of physics into the bin or
there was something around before the big bang. That appeals to me far more, but I don't fully understand about those 4 agreeing methods which make that impossible. Scientist are clinging to the big bang - our "cosmological model" because they DO trust the age of it.
Or there was a different set of laws of physics which allowed those galaxies to form really fast. Or something.

Maybe there were great concentrations of dark matter which produced incredibly strong gravitational fields which - obviously - affect time. I'm prattling above my pay grade now.

A researcher in the UK (Leicester?) called Lopez discovered it first, along with structures in what we can see of the universe, which again, shouldn't be there. ("Giant arc" etc).
Nobody has said yet, afaik, "but she was only a woman"!
TFFT!
There is also the theory that our whole universe is within a black hole.
 
Hmm, well, the "void" is not just earth,

It includes our solar system
our galaxy
and about 100000 similar galaxies
and a load of smaller ones
All in our local supercluster of galaxies.
It's called Laika something, a bit like that dog.

so it's a little disingenuous to say that Earth stands out!
So now that you have seen the vid again that I posted for you of the relevant section are you still going with lens flare.
 
I see you have been googling - ok its a void as in relation the rest of the universe
No, I had to teach GCSE Astronomy.
No it is NOT true to say that Earth is in a void in relation to anything, which is what you said. ""Oasis in the Desert"
Now you're BS ing. Going off at a tangent in a vain attempt to - I dunno what really. I think most just laugh at you and your drivlings
 
So now that you have seen the vid again that I posted for you of the relevant section are you still going with lens flare.
I just told you, read it, that I didn't find it.
It isn't worth it tbh. Something came off the rocket, if it's as you describe it "hiding".
Suggesting that it's something mystical is puerile & pathetic tbh.
 
No, I had to teach GCSE Astronomy.
No it is NOT true to say that Earth is in a void in relation to anything, which is what you said. ""Oasis in the Desert"
Now you're BS ing. Going off at a tangent in a vain attempt to - I dunno what really. I think most just laugh at you and your drivlings
I chose the sky at night version as your GCSE training probably only amounts to the sky at night. But there are other more in-depth explanations available.
 
Last edited:
I just told you, read it, that I didn't find it.
I posted it again for you --- here have a look zoom in with your phone or pad
It isn't worth it tbh. Something came off the rocket,
Yes lots of stuff came off like heat shield tiles, Ice - it was all close by "flitting past" spinning - rotating but the object does not - it appears totally stationary from behind the starship as it rotates - the object does not move but the starship is rotating and "re-veils" it behind it
if it's as you describe it "hiding".
No I described it as appearing - why are you making up what I said
Suggesting that it's something mystical is puerile & pathetic tbh.
Why so negative and abusive - there is no need.
 
Last edited:
There is also the theory that our whole universe is within a black hole.
man made climate change is made up nonsense
we all live inside a giant black hole
some mad theory about vaccines

any thing else you can add to this interesting list ?
 
Appearing from behind = unhiding. Why make a fuss about something "made up" when there's nothing,

No I haven't seen anything which categorically can't be a lens effect.
You say it cannot be something which came off because it's not spinning. So this one isn't spinning. So what.
Why so negative and abusive
Because I think you're deluding yourself, being ridiculous, entertaining daft ideas about what you can't understand, etc.
You don't even try.
You seem to like to talk **** and live in a fantasy.
So what if it's not clear what the thing is?
so what are you suggesting it is?

That's being objective, not abusive, unless you want to take it that way.

You take something well known, lie about it for some weird motive known only to you
Then you go nit-picking words and off at tangents. That is just TROLLING.
 
man made climate change is made up nonsense
we all live inside a giant black hole
some mad theory about vaccines

any thing else you can add to this interesting list ?
Wasn't there some made up waffle about passenger planes putting stuff into the exhausts for some unknown unspecified reason?

chose the sky at night version as your GCSE training probably only amounts to the sky at night.
More likely, I've dug into it a darned site more than you have. What you wrote was piffle, nowhere near right.
Did you know this "hole" is just a region a bit less dense, it's not a hole at all.
"Oasis In the desert" was an utterly ****tish thing to write.
Like most of your stuff.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't there some made up waffle about passenger planes putting stuff into the exhausts for some unknown unspecified reason?


More likely, I've dug into it a darned site more than you have. What you wrote was piffle, nowhere near right.
Did you know this "hole" is just a region a bit less dense, it's not a hole at all.
"Oasis In the desert" was an utterly ****tish thing to write.
Like most of your stuff.
Don't take my word for it
 
.

You take something well known, lie about it for some weird motive known only to you
Then you go nit-picking words and off at tangents. That is just TROLLING.
examples to back that up would be helpful
Also no one invited you onto this thread you came on just to throw abuse and now that you have been shown up a little your abuse has escalated.
You need to take stock and calm yourself.
You didn’t actually say what you think it is, you just said
" No I haven't seen anything which categorically can't be a lens effect."
 
Last edited:
Appearing from behind = unhiding. Why make a fuss about something "made up" when there's nothing,
You lied when you said I said it was hiding - I never did - it became visible as the starship turned - it was their all along but obscured by starship - what dont you understand about that'
No I haven't seen anything which categorically can't be a lens effect.
You say it cannot be something which came off because it's not spinning. So this one isn't spinning. So what.
So it didn’t come of starship - that what
Because I think you're deluding yourself, being ridiculous, entertaining daft ideas about what you can't understand, etc.
You don't even try.
You seem to like to talk **** and live in a fantasy.
What has that got to do with you
So what if it's not clear what the thing is?
So you agree with me then - good
so what are you suggesting it is?
read back I have said so about 3 times
 
man made climate change is made up nonsense
If you like.
we all live inside a giant black hole
Its an actual theory
https://www.space.com/space-explora...pace-telescope-discovery-might-blow-your-mind
some mad theory about vaccines
What mad theory have I said - clue _ I haven’t
any thing else you can add to this interesting list ?
So what do you make of the vid then.
 
Back
Top