What's happened to the small boats?

Maybe you could both try a bit of originality instead of pouring out the 'same old, same old' when stumped for a reply ;)
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

IMG_9441.webp
 
Fair enough...

Trolls of a feather and all that...

With contradiction and hypocrisy on the side...

Maybe you could both try a bit of originality instead of pouring out the 'same old, same old' when stumped for a reply ;)
All I hear from you is “please help me become a better poster mods I am lost and I just can’t help myself”.
Clip, clip, clip
 
It will only happen once or twice until the word get out and the boats will then end in 24 hours.
I don't think the Royal Navy would want it to happen once, let alone twice or more.

I cannot envisage a situation where our Navy and/or coastguard force a vessel to turn around then, if people fall out, leave them to their fate. I don't even think they'd leave the people if instructed to by the government. And as I say, although they're supposed to stay out of politics, would the King want 'his Navy' to be used in such a manner?
 
I don't think the Royal Navy would want it to happen once, let alone twice or more.

I cannot envisage a situation where our Navy and/or coastguard force a vessel to turn around then, if people fall out, leave them to their fate. I don't even think they'd leave the people if instructed to by the government. And as I say, although they're supposed to stay out of politics, would the King want 'his Navy' to be used in such a manner?
Desperation from Fromage. Not going to happen. Pure fantasy. Gullible RWR gammons roped in. Job done.
 
I don't think the Royal Navy would want it to happen once, let alone twice or more.

I cannot envisage a situation where our Navy and/or coastguard force a vessel to turn around then, if people fall out, leave them to their fate. I don't even think they'd leave the people if instructed to by the government. And as I say, although they're supposed to stay out of politics, would the King want 'his Navy' to be used in such a manner?
In the Reform document it states that they won't be pushed back to France. No, they would be 'rescued', 'taken aboard'...then taken to a French port.

I don't see an issue with that. They are coming from France. That is where they have been 'living' while waiting to illegally enter the UK so, France should accept them back and let them deal with them.....

They need to be shown that there is no boat ride to the UK! They have to come here legally.....

All the left wing, woke, gammon Britishophobics are the ones letting this country be invaded.
 
I don't think the Royal Navy would want it to happen once, let alone twice or more.

I cannot envisage a situation where our Navy and/or coastguard force a vessel to turn around
That is not the plan
then, if people fall out, leave them to their fate. I don't even think they'd leave the people if instructed to by the government.
That is not in the plan
And as I say, although they're supposed to stay out of politics, would the King want 'his Navy' to be used in such a manner?
You are making up imaginary scenarios - watch the vid I posted - farage go's into detail about it.
 
In the Reform document it states that they won't be pushed back to France. No, they would be 'rescued', 'taken aboard'...then taken to a French port.
Strangely enough that is what just happened...

"More than 150 migrants have been rescued after the boat they were using to cross the Channel caught fire on Tuesday morning, French authorities have said.

The boat was attempting to cross to the UK when its engine caught fire, according to the French maritime prefecture of the Channel and North Sea"

Rescue boats went to the scene from France and the UK, including the RNLI Eastbourne lifeboat and the UK Border Force vessels BSC Contender and BSC Courageous.

Two French boats rescued 103 migrants and the British boats rescued 54.

All of them are being taken to Boulogne-sur-Mer for treatment, where they were expected to arrive there at 12:30 local time (11:30 BST) on Tuesday"



That's what happens when you have co-operation and agreement...

What do RW nutjobs have to say about the RNLI 'taxi service' now? :rolleyes:

Deform have however stated that there would probably be confrontation with the French over their back of a fag packet 'plan'...

Thus no co-operation, and exasperating the problem as garbage has done all along!
 
I say congratulations to everyone. The first genuine rescue in feck knows how many years. Now, all they’ve got to do is rescue those foreign day-trippers who set off from France, well within French waters and do the same again. And again. And again until they get the message. See, it can be done!
 
I say congratulations to everyone. The first genuine rescue in feck knows how many years. Now, all they’ve got to do is rescue those foreign day-trippers who set off from France, well within French waters and do the same again. And again. And again. See, it can be done!
It's been done before...

Only some people refuse to accept that because it doesn't suit their narrative :rolleyes:

Maybe Burnham has decided to ramp things up a bit, with a bit more action going hand in hand with wise diplomacy...

Far better than the confrontational approach that your fuhrer has proposed, don't you think?
 
It's been done before...

Only some people refuse to accept that because it doesn't suit their narrative :rolleyes:

Maybe Burnham has decided to ramp things up a bit, with a bit more action going hand in hand with wise diplomacy...

Far better than the confrontational approach that your fuhrer has proposed, don't you think?



Unbelievable.

"Overnight "five people on board the vessel required rescue... the remaining people on board refused the assistance offered by the French patrol boats", the French maritime prefecture said".
Surely you don’t get the option of who you are rescued by? How fecking soft are we in accepting that?
They should have harpooned that boat and dragged it back to France.
 
"Overnight "five people on board the vessel required rescue... the remaining people on board refused the assistance offered by the French patrol boats", the French maritime prefecture said".

Surely you don’t get the option of who you are rescued by? How fecking soft are we in accepting that?
That's where co-operation comes in...

And if you care to note, all were returned to France...

Surely you are happy with that regardless of who did what, aren't you?
 
Strangely enough that is what just happened...

"More than 150 migrants have been rescued after the boat they were using to cross the Channel caught fire on Tuesday morning, French authorities have said.

The boat was attempting to cross to the UK when its engine caught fire, according to the French maritime prefecture of the Channel and North Sea"

Rescue boats went to the scene from France and the UK, including the RNLI Eastbourne lifeboat and the UK Border Force vessels BSC Contender and BSC Courageous.

Two French boats rescued 103 migrants and the British boats rescued 54.

All of them are being taken to Boulogne-sur-Mer for treatment, where they were expected to arrive there at 12:30 local time (11:30 BST) on Tuesday"



That's what happens when you have co-operation and agreement...

What do RW nutjobs have to say about the RNLI 'taxi service' now? :rolleyes:

Deform have however stated that there would probably be confrontation with the French over their back of a fag packet 'plan'...

Thus no co-operation, and exasperating the problem as garbage has done all along!
That, is a rarity. UK is usually the place they are brought...
 
That's where co-operation comes in...
And if you care to note, all were returned to France...
Surely you are happy with that regardless of who did what, aren't you?
There should be no need for co operation - as soon as they are in 6 feet of French water they need rescuing, I have no problem for the RNLI to sail over there and help take them back to the french shore to safety.
 
Back
Top