Have a check. I've apologised before for misunderstanding/getting the wrong end of the stick and happy to do so.
So yeah, I am strong enough to apologise/admit fault. How's that going your end? Written to the editor about your inability to understand correct reporting yet?
But it wasn't sensationalist, it was accurate reporting!
So is "Gal posts bowlogs", but it is nowhere near the full story.
Is that intended to be a bad thing to say about me? Because I neither disagree, nor would want to do so.
My formative IT years were in a place where a server was taken outside and shot the day before the OS left extended support to encourage the others.
And they get what they deserve.
Tell that to my f-i-l, he can't walk very far at all nowadays (although some of that may be down to not being first to the bar
)
So if one person is stupid should we all follow suit?Another rat licker, or do masks confuse him ?
Only stupid people would follow Corbinbag. I wear a mask when I HAVE to, and correctly, only in shops or public transport.So if one person is stupid should we all follow suit?
Yes, he wasn't a good leader - but gone now, from the whole party perhaps as of today!
Well as far as you were concerned in your earlier post, anything over £160k has to be tendered out...This thread is about an NHS IT contract - it was tendered in lots. This thread is not about emergency supply due to a global pandemic.
So.. neither wrong nor needing a lesson on the law.
FWIW, I do think emergency situations need to bypass standard procurement processes. The consequence will be from time-to-time getting a bad deal. But clearly there are plenty of bad deals that were properly tendered.
