How thick were the BBC, to deliberately falsify videos, against a serial Litigant.
Trump is suing the BBC for Ten Billion USD.
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
This is the thing. Did they mean to put a transition between the clips as would be the norm, or did they intentionally falsify.
Do you want some of my tin foil - I got loads
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 4,542
- Reaction score
- 2,262
- Country
Its obvious that you are indeed a UK hater!!!
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 18,955
- Reaction score
- 1,617
- Country
No I think you need all the tinfoil for yourself
They edited them. The spoken words were not altered (falsified). No case to answer.
Spoken like a true BBC splicer.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 14,647
- Reaction score
- 8,719
- Country
The world will only become safe again once the lefty's are out and put back into the dark where they belong. Lefty supporters are a danger to the security of this country and that is a fact.
The words that were edited to be spliced together were almost 1 hour apart. That kind of stuff is not even allowed on this forum
As usual you've got it arse about face
No, this is the Tangerine Tyrant demonstrating what we used (in my mil days) to call, a 'self hack'. Nowadays it's a self own according to the yunguns.
If you think that filmed footage is not edited or that its a rare event, you are mistaken. The BBC are a broadcasting service, that have been producing edited footage for decades. Just like any television station. It's neither unusual or unexpected.
Trump said those words. If you think the BBC altered the words he spoke, please show where.
Trumps incoherent ramblings require editing. Even Fox news has to curtail his weird blathering.
Editing of posts is allowed on this forum, you are mistaken (again).
Similar threads
