Its in action DEI before it was given its name
Right so its the little coppers own fault for getting their nose smashed to pieces then. - Keep defending your "brother"But that's is irrelevant. You don't send two slightly built policewoman and one male officer to arrest two burly known violent offenders.
About 10 years after the height restriction removed, the DEI policy was implemented.
The person responsible for sending ill-equipped under-staffed officers should share some responsibility.
Still weaponising your imagined scenario of my situation because you are denied any real personal information of mine.
Obviously, going by your post, you can't read!I've stated for as long as I've been here, i do not reveal any personal information because people like you will weaponise.
And you've proven me to be sensible in my decision because in absence of any personal information, you imagine something, which you then weaponise.
If you think weaponising your imagined personal information of others, and building on that to be abusive is your version of 'trying to inject a bit of humour', it's no wonder that you live alone in a bedsit, with no friends, and need to imagine you're a dog.
All the posts you have linked do not match what you are assuming.You admitted to be a member of the 'Blade Runners' group who were responsible for disabling the ULEZ cameras.
You've admitted to be active in that group. You've admitted to supporting the criminal damage committed by the group, describing them as Robin Hoods.
You've admitted to avoiding paying the ULEZ charge by opening your boot while moving.
You've admitted to covering your number plate, or intentionally spillng oil on it, to avoid the ULEZ charge.
You've suggested people intentionally muddy their plates so they can't be read.
You've described a child injured in a car accident caused by camera vandals as 'a casualty of war'.
You think that vandalising street furniture is not a criminal offence.
I'll let the forum decide on your willingness to commit vandalism.
They were not ill equipped.
BTW, how come you're so well informed if you joined only 6 months ago???You admitted to be a member of the 'Blade Runners' group who were responsible for disabling the ULEZ cameras.
You've admitted to be active in that group. You've admitted to supporting the criminal damage committed by the group, describing them as Robin Hoods.
You've admitted to avoiding paying the ULEZ charge by opening your boot while moving.
You've admitted to covering your number plate, or intentionally spillng oil on it, to avoid the ULEZ charge.
You've suggested people intentionally muddy their plates so they can't be read.
You've described a child injured in a car accident caused by camera vandals as 'a casualty of war'.
You think that vandalising street furniture is not a criminal offence.
I'll let the forum decide on your willingness to commit vandalism.
You’re going to have to spell out the confession you are referring to.You admitted to be a member of the 'Blade Runners' group who were responsible for disabling the ULEZ cameras.
You've admitted to be active in that group. You've admitted to supporting the criminal damage committed by the group, describing them as Robin Hoods.
You've admitted to avoiding paying the ULEZ charge by opening your boot while moving.
You've admitted to covering your number plate, or intentionally spillng oil on it, to avoid the ULEZ charge.
You've suggested people intentionally muddy their plates so they can't be read.
You've described a child injured in a car accident caused by camera vandals as 'a casualty of war'.
You think that vandalising street furniture is not a criminal offence.
I'll let the forum decide on your willingness to commit vandalism.
Still weaponising your imagined scenario of my situation because you are denied any real personal information of mine.
The wardens need to move their padded cells apart.
They're in the same cell, in the same body
