• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

A good move from Trump. We could do with this over here.

It is also an open question how, after reviewing the Service’s handling of the Savile case in 2012, Starmer reportedly “came very close to rubber-stamping the original decision not to prosecute,” before appointing his own CPS chief legal adviser, Alison Levitt, to conduct the formal inquiry. Her report’s findings unambiguously assert that Savile had a very clear case to answer based on the allegations collected against him at that time alone.

Keir was very angry! Was he, I bet he was lol
 
It is also an open question how, after reviewing the Service’s handling of the Savile case in 2012, Starmer reportedly “came very close to rubber-stamping the original decision not to prosecute,” before appointing his own CPS chief legal adviser, Alison Levitt, to conduct the formal inquiry. Her report’s findings unambiguously assert that Savile had a very clear case to answer based on the allegations collected against him at that time alone.
Correct. He therefore wasn't aware of the case at the time the reviewing layer decided not to prosecute.
 
Correct. He therefore wasn't aware of the case at the time the reviewing layer decided not to charge.
I like how it all reads.

It’s like he hand his hand in it. We wouldn’t want Keir to get angry ffs
 
I’m just throwing ideas about.
You are throwing lies about. You've read the report, it is quite clear that the reviewing lawyer who decided not to prosecute simply wasn't the PM.
 
You are throwing lies about. You've read the report, it is quite clear that the reviewing lawyer who decided not to prosecute simply wasn't the PM.
I don’t believe everything I read.

I’m saying there ideas, you’re calling them lies. Making you a liar, really.

Like I said you can’t prove he didn’t know. I can’t prove he did.

Stop trying to Troll me
 
My point was/is, you and I have NO IDEA what any of the managers do for a living; nor what would be the consequences of sacking them. 'My wife's friend's sister says...' is not evidence.

Indeed! When the management numbers increased, and their salaries increased dramatically, you do have to wonder what they actually do for their living. The consequences of sacking them, would more greater efficiency, and the NHS run more efficiently, by those on the actual front line, just as it used to be.
 
Unaware that one the highest profile 'entertainers' in the country had a file on him.

By any stretch of the imagination that's inconceivable.
Exactly my point.

The fact Jimmy Saville was being looked into would ruffle feathers, cause eyes to be raised ?

Ffs he was on tv every Saturday, raised money for charity etc.

Keir was too busy to even know……
 
Back
Top