IMO there are really two seperate questionsHowever people should consider whether a ring really is an appropriate design for the particular installation, and not just shove them in as if it's some kind of required thing that must be done because 80 years ago a committee formed to deal with the problems of construction and materials shortages following WW2 said it was.
1. 20A or 32A circuits? If you move down from 32A to 20A then IMO you want *significantly* more circuits. a 32A circuit can support two full size loads plus smalls, a 20A circuit can only support one full size load plus smalls, so I wouldn't be comfortable using it for more than a single habitable room and would want multiple of them in the kitchen.
2. If 32A then ring or radial? A ring (or 20A radial) is normally wired in 2.5mm², a 32A radial needs at least 4mm² and may well need 6mm². So your cable is significantly more expensive per meter. If you have to use 6mm² you are also likely to run into issues with terminal capacity. Not having to go back to the DB mitigates this to an extent but at least on TLC right now a 100m reel of 4mm² costs more than double a 100m reel of 2.5mm².
So I would expect that in most domestic properties rings would be the most economical soloution to providing sockets.
In an office where large loads were unlikely, but earth leakage can be high 20A radials may well be more sensible.

