Another unfortunate incident

We don't care. He was an A'hole. Better out the way. All his life he would be nothing but trouble.
 
Sponsored Links
We can draw conclusions about what the police faced on the day when we learn of his 20 years of violent behaviour.
 
We don't care. He was an A'hole. Better out the way. All his life he would be nothing but trouble.
Seems the Custody Sergeant may have help similar extremist views as yourself.
At least he'll have time to reflect on them when he visits 'the big house'.
 
Sponsored Links
Except of course a civilian is told, "You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court".....

Which is just common sense if you think about it.
Everybody is allowed to say nothing at all in whatever circumstances you care to mention.
Obviously others will then draw their own conclusions from that refusal.
Quite right...

Conclusion: Plod is covering something up yet again.... ;)

Thing is, a civilian doesn't get the chance to prevent a trial just by saying nothing...

Plus if they falsified evidence a civilian would be done for perjury or attempting to pervert the course of justice...

If plod wants respect, then when they get it wrong they have to be held accountable to the same standard as anyone else...

Since that is not the case it's hardly suprising how they are regarded!
 
Never read such nonsense in all my life ellal. :LOL: :LOL:

You should be taken out, tied to a post, and whipped. :LOL:
 
Had the Met, done nothing about it, they'd have been castigated for doing nothing. As it was they find themselves castigated for turning up and apprehending the poor chap.
Didn't members of the public who made 999 calls , realise this chap was suffering some sort of mental breakdown? And why didn't they phone for an ambulance instead? Or is it left to police officers to make a snap judgement about someone's state of mental health now?
Damned if they do and damned if they don't , should be the Met's motto.
 
Had the Met, done nothing about it, they'd have been castigated for doing nothing. As it was they find themselves castigated for turning up and apprehending the poor chap.
Didn't members of the public who made 999 calls , realise this chap was suffering some sort of mental breakdown? And why didn't they phone for an ambulance instead? Or is it left to police officers to make a snap judgement about someone's state of mental health now?
Damned if they do and damned if they don't , should be the Met's motto.
Blimey...you've changed your tune John.
 
Had the Met, done nothing about it, they'd have been castigated for doing nothing. As it was they find themselves castigated for turning up and apprehending the poor chap.
Didn't members of the public who made 999 calls , realise this chap was suffering some sort of mental breakdown? And why didn't they phone for an ambulance instead? Or is it left to police officers to make a snap judgement about someone's state of mental health now?
Damned if they do and damned if they don't , should be the Met's motto.
The bigger problem is what went on afterwards.
 
Thing is LMB, I haven't changed my tune. Big difference with this case is , the chap was a danger to the general public. Tomlinson wasn't.
Simples.
;) ;) ;)
 
Perhaps we should all avoid London then LMB. At least we won't be potential victims of the Met. ;) ;)
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top