Not sure where else to post this, and no funny replies...well maybe a couple, but what is the key difference between Architects, Architectural Technicians and Architectural Technologists?
Some have said to me its when someone flunked their architects degree or something and they cannot become RIBA qualified but as I've pointed out to some helpful people here in previous posts, my previous RIBA architect didn't know his **** from his elbow when it came to local planning rules.
I've today commissioned an older semi retired architectural technologist who is also a structural engineer (and I take back some of the comments I made about him in previous threads) but it got me thinking what are the main differences here.
So, not my intension to insult anyone here as I've found the likes of several of you to be very helpful (cjard, mercurystwim et al, tony etc) but curious to know. Did these associations / bodies all fall out and one stage and say I'm going to go one better and change clause 2.1 of the constitution.....and you me Nigel?
Some have said to me its when someone flunked their architects degree or something and they cannot become RIBA qualified but as I've pointed out to some helpful people here in previous posts, my previous RIBA architect didn't know his **** from his elbow when it came to local planning rules.
I've today commissioned an older semi retired architectural technologist who is also a structural engineer (and I take back some of the comments I made about him in previous threads) but it got me thinking what are the main differences here.
So, not my intension to insult anyone here as I've found the likes of several of you to be very helpful (cjard, mercurystwim et al, tony etc) but curious to know. Did these associations / bodies all fall out and one stage and say I'm going to go one better and change clause 2.1 of the constitution.....and you me Nigel?