Is he the Mexican Prime Minister?Hasta la vista
Is he the Mexican Prime Minister?Hasta la vista
Perhaps you don't remember Chilcot? There were no secrets kept from the enquiry. Luckily trans and his fellow conspiracy theory nutjobs have an endless supply of bullshizzle to keep them from the truth.![]()
The UK intelligence communities had an “ingrained belief” that Iraq had retained biological and chemical weapon capabilities, was determined to keep and expand them, and could hide these capabilities from inspectors.

Appallingly low standards shown by his supporters, both public and MP.
Backed by all party leaders at the time.A godsend for the area wasn't he.
Hasn't proroguing been done by pm's in the past...How many Prime Ministers can you name who have prorogued Parliament so they could rule like an Emperor, by lying to the nation, to Parliament, and to the Queen?
Just Johnson, eh?

Was he in the wrong then, or not ?Hasn't proroguing been done by pm's in the past...
John major done it so he didn't have to answer cash for questions
And Clement Attlee so he could force through nationalisation of industry
Reading the decision by the supreme court declaring BJ's prorogue advise as unlawful because it stopped parliaments ability to scrutinise by definition Clement Attlee's proroguing should also have been declared unlawful as it was used to precisely do what the supreme court said it couldn't.
Only difference between what bojo done and Clement is that bojo was taken to court over it.
Was he in the wrong then, or not ?
Lets not get into whataboutery, just the bit that is current and relevant to now

And that is whatabouteryMy point was that was it really worse than what had been done previously.... likely not.
I think Sunak would be harder for Labour to beat than Johnson.
Sunak would represent a serious politician and potentially a strong leader in a difficult period.
Im not sure Johnson would be suitable for a period of recession and hardship. Shallow boosterism won’t cut it.