BBC scared of calling Trump "the most corrupt president in history (which he demonstrably is)

[Ivor Windybottom]

I do wonder how many fewer votes lefty parties would get if cannabis didn't exist.

Wouldn't it be nice if everyone shared everything, man. If you don't think any further or consider the inevitable consequences then it all makes sense.

 

[morqthana]

It's not ridiculous. Discuss the issues not personal views or characteristics. That IS the man.
You think your view on his views , matters to others. It does not.

When the topic being discussed is a video, and someone says that he can't be bothered to watch it, then I think it perfectly valid to question the worth of any opinions he may have on it.

You are attacking Windy: - 3 pronouns referring specifically to that person, in a couple of lines.

I don't give a damn what you think of someone else's views.
Because you're self-important, not very insightful, and not objective - you're tiresomely biased as hell.
I could say it's your approach or your views that are self-important, not very insightful, and not objective - and tiresomely biased as hell. It would still be attacking YOU, would it not? I'm not attacking you I'm attacking the approach - but it IS attacking you when it's focused as YOUR approach like that.

If the forum filled up with everyone's view's on everyone else's views it would be a mass of stupidity.

YOU aren't special or important enough to be an exception. See?
It characterizes many many of your posts, or in other words, YOU.
I'm doing once what you do habitually

My view on this isn't unique or extra important due to it being mine, but it is a concensus on forums.

FFS wind yer neck in......?

OK.

Here lies your ignorance in the matter.
Climate change and visible man's pollution are 2 different things.
Don't be a knob,.
.
.
If you think otherwise it's you who's utterly ignorant.

Calling that racist is plain bloody stupid.

I qualify for a motability car but don't want one.
MM's post is full of crap. Tiresome.
Such as:

is stupid and wrong.

You don't seem to have a clue, as much as you have a prejudice.
.
.
there's no need to lie about it to try to make a point. That's what you're doing.
.
.
Got any proof? If you have, you should have shown it
If you haven't, then STFU.

It's normal for people who are clueless to take the p out of what they don't understand. That's what you're doing.
.
.
If you want any other constructive suggestions, stop making stupid personal accusations.

Nobody nobody nobody is suggesting the stupidity you set out. Straw man lying behaviour.

If you're telling us you can't the difference, you're not being honest, are you?

this is what idiots such as N above, latch on to so they can post trolly crap

Doesn't take much to surprise you, does it?
It's because your desires to say something, anything even if stupid, are even more overwhelming than your ignorance.
.
.
Many sorts of idiot can do it, but you're the wrong sort, so don't try.

Your analytical abilities are.... absent.
You're making a proper idiot of yourself.
I have no generalised opinions or affectations with political parties.
Brand? Logo?
Do stop being a jerk.

I don't know where newspapers are relevant apart from the topic idiot Diynutjob trying to introducing something stupid so he can slag it off.

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

TLDR.

Any chance of a summary of the point you're attempting to make? It's just a bunch of quotes from someone else.

 

[morqthana]

TLDR.

Any chance of a summary of the point you're attempting to make? It's just a bunch of quotes from someone else.

The point I'm making is that Justin Passing is very quick to criticise me for what he says are personal attacks rather than discussions of the issues, and yet look at what he does himself.

I'm not saying I'm a saint, and what he does doesn't make me one. But it does make him someone who has no business pointing fingers.

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

Oh right, unimportant then.

 

[Munroast]

what is it with trump: On one hand he is nearly declaring war on Venezuela on the grounds they turn a blind eye to drugs being smuggled into America, Which sounds fair enough to me

But then:

Donald Trump has said he will grand a pardon to Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras who is serving a 45-year prison sentence in the US on drug trafficking and weapons charges.

 

[morqthana]

Venezuela's Maduro is a complete and utter >$*!^#@, but what matters most to Trump is that he's a complete and utter socialist >$*!^#@.

Hernández is a drug smuggler and money launderer, but he's a conservative drug smuggler and money launderer, opposed to Maduro, and was a useful regional ally of the USA.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

what is it with trump: On one hand he is nearly declaring war on Venezuela on the grounds they turn a blind eye to drugs being smuggled into America, Which sounds fair enough to me

But then:

Donald Trump has said he will grand a pardon to Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras who is serving a 45-year prison sentence in the US on drug trafficking and weapons charges.

It's nothing to do with drugs.

It's about who will suck up to him and who won't

The guy isn't fit to be potus. He is making the world a very dangerous place.

 

[JohnD]

It's nothing to do with drugs.

It's about who will suck up to him and who won't

The guy isn't fit to be potus. He is making the world a very dangerous place.

It is reported that one of Trumps lapdogs advised his Russian counterpart how to play Trump like a fiddle, so that Putin would get his way and be given Ukraine.



"Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that Witkoff had advised Ushakov in an October phone call on how to pitch a peace deal to Trump, suggesting that they emulate the approach used to secure a ceasefire in Gaza.

“I would make the call and just reiterate that you congratulate the president on this achievement, that you supported it, you supported it, that you respect that he is a man of peace and you’re just, you’re really glad to have seen it happen. So I would say that,” Witkoff told Ushakov, according to the transcript.

Ushakov responded: “OK my friend . . . I agree with you that he will congratulate, he will say that Mr Trump is a real peace man and so and so,” according to the transcript, which the FT has not independently verified."

FT.com

 

[JohnD]

"Witkoff also told Ushakov: “I know what it’s going to take to get a peace deal done: Donetsk and maybe a land swap somewhere.”

Speaking to a Russian state television reporter on Wednesday, Ushakov did not deny that the transcripts were real and suggested that someone had leaked them to interfere in the Kremlin’s talks with the White House. “It’s unlikely this is being done to improve relations,” he said.

The transcripts were criticised by some Republicans as evidence that the White House was favouring Moscow as it sought an end to the war, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Don Bacon, a Republican congressman from Nebraska, wrote on X that “it is clear that Witkoff fully favors the Russians”, adding that “he cannot be trusted to lead these negotiations”.

FT.com

Well!

Who would have guessed!

 

[fillyboy]

"Witkoff also told Ushakov: “I know what it’s going to take to get a peace deal done: Donetsk and maybe a land swap somewhere.”

Speaking to a Russian state television reporter on Wednesday, Ushakov did not deny that the transcripts were real and suggested that someone had leaked them to interfere in the Kremlin’s talks with the White House. “It’s unlikely this is being done to improve relations,” he said.

The transcripts were criticised by some Republicans as evidence that the White House was favouring Moscow as it sought an end to the war, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Don Bacon, a Republican congressman from Nebraska, wrote on X that “it is clear that Witkoff fully favors the Russians”, adding that “he cannot be trusted to lead these negotiations”.

FT.com

Well!

Who would have guessed!

Alternatively, the 'coalition of the willing' or NATO without the US could tell Russia they're going to blow them to **** if they don''t surrender to Ukraine.

I'll wait and watch.

 

[morqthana]

The transcripts were criticised by some Republicans

But not by enough.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Alternatively, the 'coalition of the willing' or NATO without the US could tell Russia they're going to blow them to **** if they don''t surrender to Ukraine.

I'll wait and watch.

You're conflating the history of USA and NATO with the current Russian biased potus.

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

The guy isn't fit to be potus. He is making the world a very dangerous place.

According to you.

According to the US people, who get to decide such things, he's their president. So we respect that.

The choices weren't particularly great... it was him or a seemingly drunk crazy woman who wanted a war with Russia.

 

[SPLINE]

At the last election, 58% of the votes cast were for centre-left and left wing parties.

In the last GE there was a very low turnout, the lowest ever IIRC. This was because there was not a lot of choice - almost all of the parties were "centre left and left wing" as you put it. British people are conservative - we want to conserve Britain but there was little conservative option.

Those that did vote consisted of foreigners, dole-drawers and the anti-British British, i.e. people who should not have had the vote.

This government is illegitimate. It is a major fault in our voting system that those who do not contribute and only take, are allowed the vote.