Thread disruption aside, could it be the two plots of land were in separate ownership to reduce their value? One gave access to another but each was worth less individually than together. Like a pair of Chippendale chairs.
I think it's more than likely.
I can't get my head round that. Are we saying that Starmer and his parents might have worked together to con the landowner somehow into selling for a lower price. Is there a diagram of the plots. I'd like to see how it all fits together.

