- Joined
- 6 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 3,610
- Reaction score
- 1,080
- Country

Are you implying that questioning official definitions is always a bad thing even when those definitions might be outdated or incomplete?Indeed it might, to people who will not accept what dictionaries say, either because they cannot bring themselves to admit they've been wrong, or refuse to face the fact that somebody else who was wrong gave them a false definition.
Or could it be that people challenge definitions because language evolves and dictionaries cant keep up?
Lets say you only rely on one dictionary, the one laying on the table, who decides which definition is the "correct" one your dictionary or common sense?
Considering when computers were not so common in domestic households and you are saying that if someone refuses to accept what dictionaries say either because they can’t admit they were wrong or because someone else who was wrong gave them a false definition then what exactly do you expect them to do keep holding onto the wrong definition that was given to them wrongly or somehow suddenly admit they are wrong despite being told wrong in the first place? And if they do admit it is that admission really theirs or just because they were told so by another, who might also be wrong, and if so how do we ever know which wrong to trust or if there’s any right at all?
