And that.WRONG
And that.WRONG
Yes only 10 min I think he is a nice bloke good talker.Not yet. Is it worth watching.
Yes only 10 min I think the bloke is a nice bloke good talker.

He gave me it before I had him banned. Think on...Thats one of Notch7's....
Think on
#239I can't find it. Which page?

And still no source. let me help you with the parts that are fact and opinion
You must be proud.I had him banned.
#239

Yep, go back to that head-slap moment when chicken biker read this...
What if I chase them as they run off?
This situation is different as you are no longer acting in self-defence and so the same degree of force may not be reasonable. However, you are still allowed to use reasonable force to recover your property and make a citizen's arrest. You should consider your own safety and, for example, whether the police have been called. A rugby tackle or a single blow would probably be reasonable. Acting out of malice and revenge with the intent of inflicting punishment through injury or death would not.
Chasing a fleeing suspect with a weapon and subsequently using it is highly likely to be considered malice, revenge, or retaliation rather than self-defence in legal terms, particularly if the initial threat has passed.
(Source - CPS)
Post #260![]()
Yes so that seems reasonable to me what do you think?I think he is saying that, as he was turning around to get back on the bus, he saw out of the corner of his eye that the thief was about to throw a punch, so he turned back round and decked him.
CPS.It would be useful to know the origin(s) of the ones noseall is quoting.
Yes so that seems reasonable to me what do you think?
If he hadn't he would have been hit himself probablyThat seems fine to me, too.
If he hadn't he would have been hit himself probably