I did a job a few months ago
9Kw shower
2kW downflow
28w 2D light
SELV extractor fan
All fed off a 35m 25mm 3 core SWA submain and an 800KMF with a 50A fuse fitted (TNS supply)... and it only just passed the calcs!
I assume volt drop was not the limiting factor? From table 4D4B, the volt drop on 25mm 3/4C 70degC SWA is 1.5mV/A/m. According to appendix 4.6, we would ideally factor in inductance when conductors >16mmsq are involved, but using the basic resistive (r) values from 4D4B will, if anything, lead to a more conservative answer than if they were factored into the equation.
So, Ib is in the region of 11,000W/230v = 47.8A.
47.8A * 35 metres * 1.5mV/A/m = 2.5v
So, I can only assume the issue was with calculated loop impedance or touch voltage? Certainly, in terms of volt drop, 25mm is a far larger conductor than necessary for the installation you describe above.
EDIT: I've thought about this some more, and would be very interested to see your calculations, because by mine, your circuit would be well within limits for EFLI. The following are my calcs on the assumption that the 3rd core was used as earth:
Distribution circuit, 50A BS88 fuse, 5s required disconnection time. Maximum permitted Zs from table 41.4 = 1.04 Ohms
TNS supply, assumed worse case Ze = 0.8 Ohms
Maximum allowable (R1+R2) = Max permitted Zs - Ze = 1.04 - 0.08 = 0.24 Ohms
From OSG table 9A, (R1 + R2) of 25mmsq copper line + CPC conductors @ 20degC = 1.454 mOhms/metre
From OSG table 9C, temperature correction factor for PVC cable is 1.2, therefore maximum allowable (R1 + R2) = 1.454mOhms/m * 1.2 = 1.74mOhms/metre
For 35 metres of cable, R1 + R2 including correction factor will be 1.74mOhms/metre * 35 metre = 0.0609 Ohms
So, Zs at the DB where the end of your 35m run of SWA terminates will be Ze + (R1 + R2) = 0.8 + 0.0609 Ohms = 0.8609 Ohms
In any case, this is clearly well under the maximum 1.04 Ohms allowed for your protective device.
EDIT 2: Ok, I'm an idiot - completely forgot to apply x0.8 for measured Zs values. Point taken, I can see how it only just passed. However, I'm not sure x0.8 applies here, as the CPC is not of a reduced CSA. The installation could still be acceptable under the alternative method described in appendix 14.