So answers are being asked as to whether a tory leadership candidate partook of illegal substances whilst a student.
The point is does it matter now what someone did a long time back?
will it make it hard for that person to denounce other users or will he be able to speak from experience?
Should those in power be seen to be whiter than white or just accept that there is a rule for one and another for others?
Personally, i feel that although it might well be in the past( if proven true)that it could still be a case of who the hell is he to preach.
In my opinion drug taking is serious enough a reason not to allow him to run for the leadership.
What do others think?
The point is does it matter now what someone did a long time back?
will it make it hard for that person to denounce other users or will he be able to speak from experience?
Should those in power be seen to be whiter than white or just accept that there is a rule for one and another for others?
Personally, i feel that although it might well be in the past( if proven true)that it could still be a case of who the hell is he to preach.
In my opinion drug taking is serious enough a reason not to allow him to run for the leadership.
What do others think?