He didn't.
Charlie Kirk
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
If she pays for it.
Minor point, you can abort non viable pregnancies as well, at least in the UK. In the US women have died when doctors have refused to do so.
No, he didn't. Simple as that.
On gun violence Charlie Kirk said;
"I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational."
In an event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023
"I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational."
In an event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023
You said
"Charlie Kirk said people getting shot dead is a price worth paying because life is not a beautiful thing."
I said he did not. He did not. So stop spreading lies.
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2023
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 332
- Country
Because it is murder, notch. Terminating the life of the unborn babe at any point after conception is murder. And we accept that murder is wrong.
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2023
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 332
- Country
Nonsense. He was shot by a young person who was corrupted by left woke online poison and living with a transgender. The liberals criticise Charlie Kirk because they are anti-christian and deep down his view make them uneasy
thank you for your post, but I respectfully disagree
the correct use of the word baby refers to an infant post birth
scientifically after conception until around 26 weeks the foetus is not conscious and is not sentient.
there are practical considerations which count a lot in the abortion debate:
firstly post conception until birth, the growing foetus is a part of a woman, they cant be separated, and because of that, ultimately the woman must have control of the choices she makes for her body
secondly making abortion illegal doesnt stop abortion, abortion rates are the same in countries where its restricted..............so by arguing for abortion bans you are only harming women.
Nothing to suggest that this "version" is anything other than propaganda that firs a narrative. The killer was ultra far right. Even the right wing commentators aren't convinced by the so called texts. But the right need a suitable victim.
thank you for your post.
Please stick to the facts, you have no evidence that he was "corrupted by left woke nonsense" (whatever that is) an dno evidence it was a motivating factor
there is evidence his whole family is Republican and Trump supporting
there is evidence that the killer has some form of connection to Nick Fuentes and the Groyper movement -but again there is no evidence of it being a motivating factor
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2023
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 332
- Country
Ok. Never heard of Nick Fuentes before.
What do you think of the fact Robinson had a transgender partner and this may have caused his motive in murdering Kirk?
I know you twist it, but it's universally witnessed that Charlie was a devout Christian, and his views exposed those who were transitioning, as a bad thing.
Robinson couldn't take the truth and turned to murder.
He will pay twice, once now (he's facing the death penalty) and again in the coming day of judgement.
F. me, a Seventh Day Adventist.
