Charlie Kirk

I'd believe the word of a ten-year old over anything said by Trump any day o' the week.
She's 47 years old, not ten. The fact she'd lie about what her 12 year old said to make a political point shows what a disgusting human she is.
 
She's 47 years old, not ten. The fact she'd lie about what her 12 year old said to make a political point shows what a disgusting human she is.
typical right - insulting people they don't know about things they did not witness, or even believe.

Oh, sorry, lefties aren't allowed to critised right leaning individuals on this forums. Forgot myself, will logout again to preserve your feelings.
 
typical right - insulting people they don't know about things they did not witness, or even believe.

Oh, sorry, lefties aren't allowed to critised right leaning individuals on this forums. Forgot myself, will logout again to preserve your feelings.
It isnt that unbelievable if you know how social media works.

The assassination is big news, the child will have discussed it with friends and if you look for Charlie kirk comments his views on aborting pregnancies from rape are right at the top and very memorable.

If a 12 year old k new who he was before he was shot then I'd be amazed. A 12 year old knowing who he was and that he was a ****bag afterwards isnt news, it's bloody obvious.

Im going to go on a limb here and say SL isnt on TikTok.
 
It isnt that unbelievable if you know how social media works.

The assassination is big news, the child will have discussed it with friends and if you look for Charlie kirk comments his views on aborting pregnancies from rape are right at the top and very memorable.

If a 12 year old k new who he was before he was shot then I'd be amazed. A 12 year old knowing who he was and that he was a ****bag afterwards isnt news, it's bloody obvious.

Im going to go on a limb here and say SL isnt on TikTok.
Nobody cares about that. The point is that the discussion with the 12 year old did not happen. That child did not say the things his mother alleged. A moderate amount of literary experience is sufficient to spot when someone is fabricating a written account. It's very difficult to write fiction well, far more so than most people realise, and I can say without fear of correction that this story is not just fiction, it's fiction written by an unskilled author.

But you're right about one thing. I'm not on TikTok on account of having an IQ over 70.
 
If she pays for it.

I don't think you are correct. If you were to demand that the foetus be removed at 22 weeks, I suspect that, even if someone was willing to do it, you and they would be prosecuted for endangering the said foetus.
 
Nobody cares about that. The point is that the discussion with the 12 year old did not happen. That child did not say the things his mother alleged. A moderate amount of literary experience is sufficient to spot when someone is fabricating a written account. It's very difficult to write fiction well, far more so than most people realise, and I can say without fear of correction that this story is not just fiction, it's fiction written by an unskilled author.

But you're right about one thing. I'm not on TikTok on account of having an IQ over 70.
You are confused, the article was written by a different person. It is clearly and unashamedly passing on a secondhand conversation. The person attributed is 47, not the author.

But you know that no such conversation happened. Because of your keen literary analysis. Despite not actually understanding the article at all.

Are you sure you have an IQ over 70?
 
You are confused, the article was written by a different person. It is clearly and unashamedly passing on a secondhand conversation. The person attributed is 47, not the author.

But you know that no such conversation happened. Because of your keen literary analysis. Despite not actually understanding the article at all.

Are you sure you have an IQ over 70?
Who do you think the account came from? It says right there - 'from Emily Cleary, a 47-year-old journalist".

Now how do you think Emily Cleary made this information known? Telepathy? Smoke signal? No, she wrote it down, hence the quotes.

Then the entire narrative was written down in the article cited and claimed as fact.

With this information now revealed, go back and read my post and understand it.

Anybody who believes that -

He (the 12 year old) began filling her in on a long, detailed list of Kirk’s views. “He thinks that if a 10-year-old gets pregnant she should be forced to keep it,” he explained.

- needs to basically get back on TikTok and say there, because the real world's not for them.
 
I don't think you are correct. If you were to demand that the foetus be removed at 22 weeks, I suspect that, even if someone was willing to do it, you and they would be prosecuted for endangering the said foetus.
Yeah, I must have misread your post. I'd guess that the answer is no unless there is pressing medical issues. It's not the sort of thing that has a simple answer as human biology and medicine is too complicated.

At 22 weeks survival is about 1%. 25 weeks it's 50%, 26 gets you to 77%. In the UK anything before 26 weeks is more or less only to save the life of the mother. In the US they're more likely to let the mother die by refusing treatment.
 
I'm glad you agree with me.
It is also a logical fallacy. In your world you have to have an IQ under 70 to be on TikTok but nothing says you have to be on TikTok if your IQ is under 70. A means B but B does not mean A.

If youre going to be rude about people's intelligence then take a bit more care.
 
I wasn't in agreement with you.
You were. Ironic that the topic is having an IQ over 70.

Me - people on TikTok don't have IQs over 70.
You - well Trump is on there and I bet his IQ isn't over 70!

Also you - DUH!
 
Back
Top