Charlie Kirk

[Notch7]

Only someone who never listened to Charlie Kirk and doesn't have the brainpower to address his arguments and instead would rather skim a compendium of out of context clips would find that useful. Sad.

Anybody, like me that has watched Charlie Kirk at length, would know he doesn’t have any arguments, just MAGA talking points.

Charlie Kirk had just memorised a whole string of logical fallacies and his debating was an endless stream of pivots so he could trot one out. He did it all at a gosh gallop to try and make himself look clever.


I realise Charlie Kirk’s intellectual superficiality won over those lacking intellectual acuity, like yourself…..but you weren’t the only so don’t beat yerself about it

 

[pete01]

Anybody, like me that has watched Charlie Kirk at length, would know he doesn’t have any arguments, just MAGA talking points.

Charlie Kirk had just memorised a whole string of logical fallacies and his debating was an endless stream of pivots so he could trot one out. He did it all at a gosh gallop to try and make himself look clever.


I realise Charlie Kirk’s intellectual superficiality won over those lacking intellectual acuity, like yourself…..but you weren’t the only so don’t beat yerself about it

Do you think you could have out debated him? I dont think you could have, would have liked to see it....

 

[Notch7]

Do you think you could have out debated him? I dont think you could have, would have liked to see it....

easy

Could’ve done it whilst doing a crossword, learning Latin on headphones and knitting a fairisle jumper……wouldn’t even have dropped a stitch.

 

[pete01]

easy

Could’ve done it whilst doing a crossword, learning Latin on headphones and knitting a fairisle jumper……wouldn’t even have dropped a stitch.

Haha, doubt it

 

[Si_]

Anybody, like me that has watched Charlie Kirk at length, would know he doesn’t have any arguments, just MAGA talking points.

Charlie Kirk had just memorised a whole string of logical fallacies and his debating was an endless stream of pivots so he could trot one out. He did it all at a gosh gallop to try and make himself look clever.


I realise Charlie Kirk’s intellectual superficiality won over those lacking intellectual acuity, like yourself…..but you weren’t the only so don’t beat yerself about it

Time and again you've proven you're unable to even source a quote from Google. The idea of you debating anyone, let alone someone like Kirk, is inconceivable. The nearest you get to debate is when you contest your PIP payments.

 

[MNW67]

Anybody, like me that has watched Charlie Kirk at length, would know he doesn’t have any arguments, just MAGA talking points.

Charlie Kirk had just memorised a whole string of logical fallacies and his debating was an endless stream of pivots so he could trot one out. He did it all at a gosh gallop to try and make himself look clever.


I realise Charlie Kirk’s intellectual superficiality won over those lacking intellectual acuity, like yourself…..but you weren’t the only so don’t beat yerself about it

Kirk was a very slick debater in his chosen format, much like Jordan Peterson and J D Vance are. They all have a bag full of tricks to derail the conversation and throw the other person off balance. Kirk particularly seemed to like debating young people. That doesn't make them right. Having your ideas tested in a proper discussion by a rigorous interviewer is another matter.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Kirk was a very slick debater in his chosen format, much like Jordan Peterson and J D Vance are. They all have a bag full of tricks to derail the conversation and throw the other person off balance. Kirk particularly seemed to like debating young people. That doesn't make them right. Having your ideas tested in a proper discussion by a rigorous interviewer is another matter.

Spouting a stream of 'statistics' to bamboozle the other participant in a discussion is an easy win for someone so inclined.
The trick is to slow down the discussion, not be diverted and fact check the 'statistics'.

 

[yorksbuilder]

easy

Could’ve done it whilst doing a crossword, learning Latin on headphones and knitting a fairisle jumper……wouldn’t even have dropped a stitch.

Then why do you hide on a diy website and just big yourself up all the time ? Egotistical idiot. Do you realise you've about 3 little worshippers on this forum, and hundreds who don't like you? Go out and refute all the arguments in public then! But you can't.

Stick to your knitting, you left wing liberal nancy.

 

[yorksbuilder]

Spouting a stream of 'statistics' to bamboozle the other participant in a discussion is an easy win for someone so inclined.

That what you try to do on this forum?

Tried it as ten names, doubtfyre etc. Hopefully won't be long until you're booted off again

 

[MNW67]

Stick to your knitting, you left wing liberal nancy.

OMG!

 

[Knave of Hearts]

That what you try to do on this forum?

Just using real data, and sound logic to question the more outlandish claims.
Is that not what you would expect in a reasonable discussion forum?
Or do you prefer the typical trolling style of discussion, like your typical post?

Tried it as ten names, doubtfyre etc. Hopefully won't be long until you're booted off again

 

[yorksbuilder]

There you go, the 2 notch apologists immediately respond. Are you all actually the same person?

Notch is like "look at me, of course I could have debated Charlie Kirk and won" after the man has been shot dead and he knows he's safe from losing a debate!

Notch sticks to online forums where he can use ChatGPT to answer every question he comes across.

 

[MNW67]

There you go, the 2 notch apologists immediately respond. Are you all actually the same person?

Notch is like "look at me, of course I could have debated Charlie Kirk and won" after the man has been shot dead and he knows he's safe from losing a debate!

Notch sticks to online forums where he can use ChatGPT to answer every question he comes across.

Are you counting me as one of them?

I only posted "OMG". Which is a well known joke on here.

 

[Notch7]

The nearest you get to debate is when you contest your PIP payments

PIP payments aren’t “contested”, there is no debate. A written appeal is the process.

You can’t even get insults correct

Have a lovely evening

 

[Notch7]

Then why do you hide on a diy website and just big yourself up all the time ? Egotistical idiot. Do you realise you've about 3 little worshippers on this forum, and hundreds who don't like you? Go out and refute all the arguments in public then! But you can't.

Stick to your knitting, you left wing liberal nancy

There you go, the 2 notch apologists immediately respond

Thank you for your kind words, very touching.

Did you mention you are a Christian, I just wondered if you felt your posts were suitably Christian, or would you like to reflect on them

Have a lovely evening, by the way are you actually a builder in York?