Correct cable for extra low voltage lighting

Joined
20 Feb 2007
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Country
United Kingdom
Can anyone advise on the correct cable for low voltage lighting (12v). I have used in the past 2.5mm 2 core flex (which I had a big roll given to me but has now run out) but no one seems to sell this.

The local elec suppliers say just use .75 flex or a 1.5mm Twin and earth but these seem wrong cable type for the job.....
 
Sponsored Links
Vital question:

Do you mean the cables for the primary or the secondary sides?
 
Then the size depends on the wattage the cable supplies.

10 x 50 watt lamps at 12 volts is just over 41 amps. So you'd need 6mm cable. Not practical, so the normal route is to have one transformer per light fitting so normal lighting cable can be used (1.0 or 1.5mm²). Or use a type of transformer with several outputs. Or split the output close to the transformer.
 
Sponsored Links
Twin and earth and tape up/snip off the earth? Or would you use a two core flex?

I've got loads of 1.5mm twin and earth you see :eek:)
 
Then the size depends on the wattage the cable supplies.

And the length of run, too.

If you have a high VA load running even a short distance, it's surprising just how much bigger the cable needs to be.
 
105va trany's
2 cable runs from each trany (secondry) max 3m cable run to 50w bulbs
 
Anyone agree that standard 1.5mm twin and earth cable would do the job? Just trim back the earth conductor?
 
Any reason why you can't make these cable runs on the LV (primary) side & put the tranny local to the fitting?
 
Any reason why you can't make these cable runs on the LV (primary) side & put the tranny local to the fitting?

P = V*I

Low voltage = high current.

Power dissapation in cable is = I^2 * r, meaning long LV high current cabling will lead to inefficient wiring.
 
Any reason why you can't make these cable runs on the LV (primary) side & put the tranny local to the fitting?

P = V*I

Low voltage = high current.

Power dissapation in cable is = I^2 * r, meaning long LV high current cabling will lead to inefficient wiring.

Don't you mean "long ELV high current"

Secure's suggestion is the valid and usual way to do this. Long cable runs on the LV side (230v) to transformer near lamp location then short as posible runs in ELV (12v) to the lamp itself.

Thank you for the Ohm's Law reminder though.
 
Any reason why you can't make these cable runs on the LV (primary) side & put the tranny local to the fitting?

P = V*I

Low voltage = high current.

Power dissapation in cable is = I^2 * r, meaning long LV high current cabling will lead to inefficient wiring.

Don't you mean "long ELV high current"

Secure's suggestion is the valid and usual way to do this. Long cable runs on the LV side (230v) to transformer near lamp location then short as posible runs in ELV (12v) to the lamp itself.

Thank you for the Ohm's Law reminder though.

Yes, thats exactly what I meant, getting away from IEE Semantics! ;)

I misread the post, ELV vs LV and all that. I thought the suggestion was to have longer "ELV" lighting, where of course, anything under 500V is it? Is classed as LV.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top