Nope.
Criminals and the No comment answer
- Thread starter gasbanni
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Who said they didn't?
Certainly not I.
Get a grown up to read this back to you fellas.
Didn't think it would be - not what you wanted to hear was it.
Sponsored Links
I don't care what you say about the police, you have to admire their common sense.
A man with a sledgehammer is thought to have targeted four mosques in Birmingham in a string of attacks.
The force has yet to establish a motive.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-47651350
The force has yet to establish a motive.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-47651350
The reason police interviews are now recorded was because the police had a habit of taking shortcuts when it came to solving crime.
Beating confessions out of suspects and forging interview notes was common.
The right to stay silent is there to protect the innocent and not the guilty.
Beating confessions out of suspects and forging interview notes was common.
The right to stay silent is there to protect the innocent and not the guilty.
Common sense would say it was a racist white guy but you never know. An Imman was killed near me, it was initially reported as a hate crime - murdered because he was a Muslim. Turned out he was murdered because he wasn’t Muslim enough.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&s...aw1KpqUZHBkzX22IZJQ1W8ww&ust=1553255515960901
The murderer was an IS supporter.
Some consider the practice of taweez as positive but IS, which Syeedy and Mr Kadir were said in court to support, regards all "magic" as forbidden and believes those who practise it should be punished, often by death.
So the description of not being Muslim enough is a little misleading. A more accurate description would be that the imam was killed because he did not support the extreme views of IS.
Sharp as a tack.
Can you ask Matty to show the police interviews where they twist things please?
None of the RWR seem capable. Oh well perhaps it's just more right wing bulls hit.
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 9,448
- Reaction score
- 895
- Country
Nose, we don't all get to spend all day on here - some of us have jobs and a life, you should try it some day.
FWIW I have never claimed to have access to "police interviews", thats some fabrication of your pal.
I have watched many police interactions on youtube because there are many, its the in thing these days to record your conversation with a police officer and slap it on youtube.
Try looking for "crimebodge" he has plenty of videos explaining why the police were lying when they did their thing.
You will of course deny that any of them actually happened or are on youtube or some other BS answer and say that I'm wrong because it helps your narrative, so you do what you want.
FWIW I have never claimed to have access to "police interviews", thats some fabrication of your pal.
I have watched many police interactions on youtube because there are many, its the in thing these days to record your conversation with a police officer and slap it on youtube.
Try looking for "crimebodge" he has plenty of videos explaining why the police were lying when they did their thing.
You will of course deny that any of them actually happened or are on youtube or some other BS answer and say that I'm wrong because it helps your narrative, so you do what you want.
Hillsborough!
Me neither. That'll be a no then.
P.S.
I'm sitting next to someone who has given hundreds of interviews under caution and he thinks you are talking bolax too.
They falsified statements.
Matty can't seem find any police interviews where they twist things.
'twist things' and 'falsified' are essentially the same thing - an attempt to pervert the course of justice!
Many such examples can be found without even trying that hard!
(Plod even changed some of their own officers statements at Hillsborough, and 'suggested' that the answers they required were given by police and civilians alike!)
What people have to understand is that the aim of a Police interview is to obtain 'admissible' evidence with which to prosecute you - it is not a search for the truth.
Why else do you think that the police comment when releasing an innocent person is invariably that 'insufficient evidence has been found...'
Sponsored Links
