Do all Chinese goods and Chinese jobs get massive subsidies?

you used the argument that Chinese state subsidies are the reason Chinese goods are cheaper -your argument is based on that applying to everything


I just pointed out it is true for some sectors only, not everything


gas112 admits he is wrong
Yet again poor old Notchies eyesight failing him and seeing words not actually written .
I think when Trump is mentioned he is gripping far far too hard and causing his eyes to squint
 
Yet again poor old Notchies eyesight failing him and seeing words not actually written .
I think when Trump is mentioned he is gripping far far too hard and causing his eyes to squint
Please stop squirming its embarrassing for you

you tried to dishonestly claim that Chinese state subsidies are the sole reason Chinese goods are so cheap

but even if those were removed, Chinese goods would still be cheaper than America producing them

poor gas112 cant be honest because he supports the Trump liar
 
Please stop squirming its embarrassing for you

you tried to dishonestly claim that Chinese state subsidies are the sole reason Chinese goods are so cheap

but even if those were removed, Chinese goods would still be cheaper than America producing them

poor gas112 cant be honest because he supports the Trump liar
poor old notchy struggling with his reading and the basics of economics no wonder he cant add up his premium bonds
 
predictable lie from Motorbiking

you have posted a link to a study, but youve not provided any quote or evidence it supports your claim

this is one of your commonly used dishonest debating techniques



show me the actual evidence
Where is the evidence of your claim? - none.

I see you didn't read the one pager:


A recent working paper published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) found that subsidies made up 95 percent of all Chinese trade distortive policies between 2009 and 2022. For western observers and politicians who have long complained of the impact of Chinese subsidies on domestic producers, the report provides a degree of vindication. As China continues to file complaints with the WTO for other countries’ supposedly excessive tariff regimes, it raises a crucial question: what role does China’s subsidies play in global trade distortion? These frequent complaints may indicate a defensive posture in response to external pressures, but they reveal a concerning disconnect from the implications of its own subsidy program.
 
Where is the evidence of your claim? - none.

I see you didn't read the one pager:


A recent working paper published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) found that subsidies made up 95 percent of all Chinese trade distortive policies between 2009 and 2022. For western observers and politicians who have long complained of the impact of Chinese subsidies on domestic producers, the report provides a degree of vindication. As China continues to file complaints with the WTO for other countries’ supposedly excessive tariff regimes, it raises a crucial question: what role does China’s subsidies play in global trade distortion? These frequent complaints may indicate a defensive posture in response to external pressures, but they reveal a concerning disconnect from the implications of its own subsidy program.
There has been a history of countries complaining about other countries subsidies for their manufacturing industries etc since time immemorable.
 
You suggested the few EU states that are in the Euro to to dispute my use of 'most'.
It's actually most EU countries that are in the eurozone. But no, I merely pointed out that those in the Eurozone have no ability to do this. I did not make any point to disagree with your view that most countries can do this. Had I been disagreeing with you, I would have said : incorrect, wrong, nonsense, more boll@x from you etc.
 
Last edited:
It's actually most EU countries that are in the eurozone. But no, I merely pointed out that those in the Eurozone have no ability to do this. I did not make any point to disagree with your view that most countries can do this. Had I been disagreeing with you, I would have said : incorrect, wrong, nonsense, more boll@x from you etc.
Youn should take a tip from David Lammy and recognise when you;ve made a mistake.
 
Back
Top