Could you perhaps enlighten me about these "Emergency Switching Regulations"?However, if you consider the emergency switching regulations ...
I would say that it makes sense to have some means of 'emergency switching' which is 'not too far from' (but also 'not too close to'!) a cooker - so if the CU is not reasonably close to the kitchen (and accessible) (which I imagine it pretty often will be), then it probably makes sense to have a switch in the kitchen.Probably not hence my "If you consider" but then if you do not consider it necessary then cooker switches are not required apart from whatever the reason for manufacturer's instructions.
None of my CUs are going to be changed any time soon and (assuming that even more draconian regs don't appear in the interm period!) even if/when they are replaced, I'll know for sure that their enclosures are not live, without needing warning lightsAh, perhaps when you have your new CU fitted you should have a warning light which lights when the CU is live.
I don't think you would be able to find a 32A fuse. A 30A fuse is the 'equivalent' of a modern 32A breaker (which is what they are thinking of), so will be fine....also i have an old style meter and the cooker fuse is 30 amps.....should i replace this with a 32 amp fuse as well
Iv had a look at the manual and it says that it must be fitted using a double pole isolating switch with a minimum of 32 amps.......so that will be the cooker switch. ......
Before January this year that was true. Now you can do a risk assessment and not follow manufacturers instruction if of course everything complies with amendment 3 which means it will need RCD protection labelling will no longer be permitted.Iv had a look at the manual and it says that it must be fitted using a double pole isolating switch with a minimum of 32 amps.......so that will be the cooker switch. ......
That's your answer to the first question. If the manufacturer says that you should have a DP isolation switch, then one is necessary.
Unless you do another risk assessment, I believe.Before January this year that was true. Now you can do a risk assessment and not follow manufacturers instruction if of course everything complies with amendment 3 which means it will need RCD protection labelling will no longer be permitted.
As I've said before, I'll be very interested to see if the change in that regulation makes much difference to what people, particularly electricians, do. I suspect that, given the inevitable interest in 'protecting backsides', many electricians will decide that it's 'safer' to carry on blindly 'obeying' MIs (no matter how silly they may seem), just like they always have done. Ironically, some of the more informed of non-electricians may perhaps feel more inclined to take advantage of the change!Before January this year that was true. Now you can do a risk assessment and not follow manufacturers instruction ....
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local