H
holmslaw
..
I'm sure that's true, but most installations around 50 years ago were not new ones, but were pre-war (i.e. 70+ years old) and many remained in that state for decades thereafter.Most of the brass fitting and round-pin plugs dated back 70 years. By 50 years ago new installations looked pretty modern.
I have some sympathy with that. However, the roofspace and unfloor spaces of my house are littered with remnants of steel conduit from that era, and the nature of the couplings, elbows and tees is such that I would have had very little confidence that decent earth continuity was maintained throughout the system. That's not a criticism of steel conduit, per se, but of the sort of system which was in this house (and which I think was very common).I have mixed feelings about the loss of concentric earth protection (from earthed steel conduit) without RCDs, which happened with the advent of T+E cabling some 60 years ago.
I don't imagine they could even spell 'honest'. That's a concept unfamilar to most politicians.That europa website is the european unions official website, it will also probably tell me that MEP's are honest
Yes, I kind of got that impression! Don't let that put you off European Standards though, they are written by experts and published by CEN, CENELEC, and ETSI, and don't come from the parliament, who wouldn't understand them even if they could read.I think you will have gathered that I have zero interest in anything that comes out of that clearly proven den of corruption called the european parliament
the truth should not be allowed to interfere with a bit of healthy euro bashing
Glad you're not. There are quite enough of them already thank you.PS. Wish I was one of those thieving MEP bast***s.
Indeed. I think that's what I said. Such issues of 'safety' (in the broadest sense) are obvioulsy only one aspect of Standards - but when they exist, they are indeed minimum standards. The more basic aspect of Standards (probably the original reason for their introduction) was to ensure, say, that one man's 13A plug fits into another man's 13A socket - and there is clearly no scope for deviation from those parts of a Standard.All British Standards are the minimum acceptable standard, they do not preclude someone manufacturing a higher standard product.It appears that everyone has to test their double sockets to 20A total load, since that is what BS1363 requires. However, that obviously does not prevent some of them (e.g. MK) testing their (perhaps superior) products to 26A.
I'm not sure bas said/asked that....snip.......As to BAS's request for a photo of a standard UK socket outlet showing the rating marked on the socket which is something other than 13A, if someone were to make such a socket then it wouldn't be a 13A socket, wouldn't comply with BS 1363-2, and therefore wouldn't be a standard UK socket-outlet, which I guess was the point BAS was making......snip....
All these sockets were wired with the old 7/029 rubber cable which initially was 2-core and a separate bare earth of 3/029 was run alongside. With the coming of PVC insulation the CPC ran inside the outer sheath.
I'm pretty sure most of these cables were aluminium or cupro-aluminium, as they tended to be silver in colour. Anyone else care to reminisce?
I'm certainly glad that we've seen the demise of the early 13A plugs, which had 'holes' for the cable in the cover, rather than U-shaped 'cutouts' we now see - I wish I had a pound for every time I connected such a plug, only to have to do it again when I discovered that I'd forgotten to first thread the cable through the hole!
I am not so sure that things were that dangerous. If there was no metalic earthed things in the room then the risk of a lethal electric shock was probably very low. A few finger to finger shocks maybe would happen and provide a few lessons in not fiddling in electrical fittings.
There was a time when common sense and self protection was trusted as a way to protect people. It worked for most people and the presence of risk meant that sensible people looked out for danger and avoided it.
Perhaps a few non sensible people were lost, but that could be said to be an improvment of the gene pool.
Society today, or rather the nanny state, wants to remove all risks and dangers and too many people believe that all danger has been removed and have ceased to practice self protection. And a few ( or maybe a lot ) think that if they are injured or suffer loss from something dangerous they can sue someone and have a financially secure future.
That europa website is the european unions official website, it will also probably tell me that MEP's are honest, that EU accounts are all in order and that it makes economic sense to move headquarters between brussels and strasbourg every six months.
I don't think anyone has got anywhere near suggesting that anyone should contemplate attempting a load greater than 13A on a 13A socket - and, in any event, where would they find a fuse of large enough rating (>13A) to put in the plug?Until then, i'm happy to accept the (perhaps simplistic) rule of thumb that the total load connected to a 13A socket should be limited to 13A. Its not too leftfield an idea and I like it
Indeed, and that's a point I keep making. I strongly suspect that a double socket with 2x13A loads would be no more of a problem than a single socket loaded at 13A, even though BS1363 does not include a test which would confirm that.Until IMHO, 'how it is tested' and 'what it is rated at' are two different things.
OK - then how about this:If you look on the Europa web site you will find that that myth was debunked some years ago.European standards are best demonstrated by bananas. Some eurow***er decided on the shape of a standard banana.
That europa website is the european unions official website, it will also probably tell me that MEP's are honest, that EU accounts are all in order and that it makes economic sense to move headquarters between brussels and strasbourg every six months.
And, the truth should not be allowed to interfere with a bit of healthy euro bashing.
Ah - but they have rubber covers, don't they - in which case the problem would be one that could easily be solved with a sturdy pair of side cuttersEasily done! But "thread on" covers have continued to be employed on some designs, so it's not exclusively an age-related issue. Look at any of the current Duraplug range, for example.I'm certainly glad that we've seen the demise of the early 13A plugs, which had 'holes' for the cable in the cover, rather than U-shaped 'cutouts' we now see - I wish I had a pound for every time I connected such a plug, only to have to do it again when I discovered that I'd forgotten to first thread the cable through the hole!
Ah - but they have rubber covers, don't they - in which case the problem would be one that could easily be solved with a sturdy pair of side cutters
Ah - but they have rubber covers, don't they - in which case the problem would be one that could easily be solved with a sturdy pair of side cutters
That's true! Either way, at least with a simple plug like this it doesn't feel quite as bad when you realize you forgot to thread the cover on first as when you've just soldered a 50-way connector, or even a 9-way D-connector and then realize that the cover is still sitting on the bench (and, of course, the time you forget to slide the cover on first always seems to be on the second connector, so it can't just be slid on from the other end).
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local