• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Earth funnies and phantom voltages on lighting circuit

as you say, the only theoretical 'risk' involves electricity being conducted through flowing (pretty 'clean') water, which is probably very unlikely to result in a serious shock - and, as above, the risk of any such shock would be increased by the presence of any touchable earthed metal in the vicinity.

Again, I will have to disagree with you. The difference between making contact with a dry live cable (or similar live part), and water that is live, is the much greater area of contact, plus likely volume of water.
 
I would suggest otherwise... I would suggest from my experience, that metalwork becoming live, is just as common as making direct contact with the likes of a frayed cable, at least for the average member of the public.
If most of the pipework were electrically isolated from electrical things (CH pumps/valves/boilers, immersions, showers etc.) how do you envisage that the pipework would 'become live'?
 
Again, I will have to disagree with you. The difference between making contact with a dry live cable (or similar live part), and water that is live, is the much greater area of contact, plus likely volume of water.
There's nothing wrong with our disagreeing!

However, one of the main issues about the theoretical conduction of electricity through water in this situation is that it is based on the assumption that there is a 'solid block of water' from where there is some 'live electricity' to where it is in contact with a person. In practice, what hits the person is likely to be a shower of 'droplets', not in close contact with one another - which is one of the reasons why the conductivity of 'a tube full of water' is much greater (albeit low, for 'clean' water) than the conductivity of water 'flowing' out of a tap or shower head.
 
I have to say that I am a bit confused by this worrying about the conductivity of the water in the pipes.

Need anything be done to safeguard against it?
I have never considered it apart from the very small distance a joint may separate two metal parts.


There are no bits of plastic, anywhere in my plumbing installation, I would not allow plastic, but you cannot gamble on some wannabe plumber coming along and replacing sections of the copper with plastic. So your earth bonding, is then entirely relying upon the conductivity of the water, in the pipes.
Regarding the emboldened sentence.

If the conductivity of the water were anything to worry about then surely the water itself would be acting as a bonding conductor joining the originally bonded pipe to the now isolated (apart from the water) pipe.

So - do we, in fact, need to bond any water pipes? They all contain a conductor wherever they go.


The copper pipe, leading to the shower, and I would assume (not checked) any internal metal in contact with the water, plus maybe the flexible metal shower hose. The main risk with an electric shower, is that of electrical leakage from the shower elements, to the water. That would be effectively given a path to ground, via the bonded copper supply pipe.
Why is that bad? Would it not cause the protective device to disconnect the supply.


Do they still make metal hoses for showers? They could be a worry.
 
I have to say that I am a bit confused by this worrying about the conductivity of the water in the pipes. ... Need anything be done to safeguard against it?
I have never considered it apart from the very small distance a joint may separate two metal parts.
As I wrote, I've never really thought of it as something that one needs to 'worry about' - not the least because of what I say about the 'stream' of water (droplets) from a tap or shower head being very different from a 'solid block' of water in a pipe.
.... If the conductivity of the water were anything to worry about then surely the water itself would be acting as a bonding conductor joining the originally bonded pipe to the now isolated (apart from the water) pipe. .... So - do we, in fact, need to bond any water pipes? They all contain a conductor wherever they go.
Quite. I do not believe that the contained water would be anything like conductive enough to be usable as 'bonding'.
Do they still make metal hoses for showers? They could be a worry.
I think that many/most of them are still 'metal', at least on the outside, but it's possible that, in many cases, that metal surrounds a non-conductive tube/pipe within. However, even if it is all metal, I think that the hose is almost invariably screwed on to a plastic connector - so, again, any electrical 'continuity' would have to be due to the water.
 
If most of the pipework were electrically isolated from electrical things (CH pumps/valves/boilers, immersions, showers etc.) how do you envisage that the pipework would 'become live'?

Metal pipework, expanding and contracting, rubbing against live cables. Nails and screws, piercing cables, and contacting pipes. Fixing screws for radiator brackets, making contact with buried cables in walls. There are lots of ways for metal to become live.
 
However, one of the main issues about the theoretical conduction of electricity through water in this situation is that it is based on the assumption that there is a 'solid block of water' from where there is some 'live electricity' to where it is in contact with a person. In practice, what hits the person is likely to be a shower of 'droplets', not in close contact with one another - which is one of the reasons why the conductivity of 'a tube full of water' is much greater (albeit low, for 'clean' water) than the conductivity of water 'flowing' out of a tap or shower head.

The flow does usually break-up, but not close to the shower head, besides, and people do reach up to adjust the position of the head.
 
So - do we, in fact, need to bond any water pipes? They all contain a conductor wherever they go.

That, would depend upon the relative resistances of the two paths - from shower head, through the body to ground, versus the alternative. If the alternative, is through the shower, fed via plastic pipe, and the rest of the pipes are plastic, the 'water column' resistance, could be much higher, than via the body.
Do they still make metal hoses for showers? They could be a worry.

The normal for electric showers, is a plastic 'liner' pipe, spiral wound with a metal - rather like the old flexible conduit.
 
Metal pipework, expanding and contracting, rubbing against live cables. Nails and screws, piercing cables, and contacting pipes. Fixing screws for radiator brackets, making contact with buried cables in walls. There are lots of ways for metal to become live.
There are, although I would personally think that all the things you mention are extremely improbable (very rare) - and, importantly, probably more improbable than 'other things' becoming live (or indeed, silly people touching intentionally live things) - in which latter case the risk of shock is slightly increased by having earthed pipework/radiators etc. around that could be touched simultaneously.
 
The flow does usually break-up, but not close to the shower head, besides, and people do reach up to adjust the position of the head.
That's all theoretically true.

As I may well have reported here in the past, a long time ago, in response to discussions like this one, I did an experiment in which I had water coming out of a (metal) tap and 'pouring onto' a copper 'electrode' at various distances from the tap - and the resistance between tap and electrode was always much higher than would give me any 'cause for concern'.
 
That's all theoretically true.

As I may well have reported here in the past, a long time ago, in response to discussions like this one, I did an experiment in which I had water coming out of a (metal) tap and 'pouring onto' a copper 'electrode' at various distances from the tap - and the resistance between tap and electrode was always much higher than would give me any 'cause for concern'.
Much depends on the purity of the water, experiments we did some decade plus ago we were able to trip a RCD at a bit under a foot but repeating with exactly the same kit some 100 miles distant it was almost unrepeatable.
 
As I may well have reported here in the past, a long time ago, in response to discussions like this one, I did an experiment in which I had water coming out of a (metal) tap and 'pouring onto' a copper 'electrode' at various distances from the tap - and the resistance between tap and electrode was always much higher than would give me any 'cause for concern'.

The conductivity of the mains water supply, varies quite dramatically from area to area, but it's not something the water companies usually specify.
 
Much depends on the purity of the water, experiments we did some decade plus ago we were able to trip a RCD at a bit under a foot but repeating with exactly the same kit some 100 miles distant it was almost unrepeatable.
Indeed, the purity of the water has a very marked effect on conductivity. However, one would expect hard water to have higher conductivity than soft, and I've only ever lived in very hard water areas, so the experiments I've done in the past must have been in that context.

In experiments, I've certainly got RCDs to trip by dropping a 'wet cloth' onto a pair of conductors, one connected to L and the other to E - but, again, there is then a fairly 'solid mass of water' between the two electrodes, which is rather different from 'streams of water' flowing in air.
 
There are, although I would personally think that all the things you mention are extremely improbable (very rare)

During my working career, I was called out to numerous items which had for various reasons become live, so I would not call it either improbable, or particularly rare. For the most part, they were simply due to a lost earth, with which this thread began, but not all.
 
The conductivity of the mains water supply, varies quite dramatically from area to area, but it's not something the water companies usually specify.
Mine (Anglian Water) certainly does, along with countless other chemical and physical properties of the water in their reports, and I'd be surprised if yours did not do the same ....
1759172386365.png
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top