- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,564
- Reaction score
- 2,176
- Country
That is absolutely not an acceptable excuse to ignore it now, viewed in today's 'norm of the time'.The problem with the radical and dangerous left is that they do not look at history in context. Slavery is - quite rightly - viewed as an historical wrong, but it was an economic norm of the time.
That is absolutely not an acceptable excuse to ignore it now, viewed in today's 'norm of the time'.
If the additional plaque had been added in a suitable time frame, then i very much doubt there would have been any 'statue toppling' occurring.
It was the prevarication of history, that motivated the 'statue toppling'.
Mr Ferguson was replaced as Mayor in 2016, so his opinion was rather out of date.From the article:
"Whenever the question was asked in the past two decades in opinion polls, letters pages and radio phone-ins, it seemed that the majority of people in Bristol said they wanted the Colston Statue to stay.
They also wanted the Colston Hall name to remain. The argument was that removing Colston's statue and the name from city landmarks and venues would mean the city's slave trade past could be forgotten."
?????
I tend to agree, although maybe it could be argued, a jury acquitted them -is that not democracy, the law Id guess is part of democracy, laws get introduced bySurely democratic process should prevail? Who decides if something should be changed the elected leaders or the unelected who don't like it. Would I be justified in attacking statues of those who promote the concept of white privilege?
Hey, God. Were you previously known on here as 'dontbelieveawordofit' or 'bennymultifinish'?
Some things don't have a statute of limitations.I hope nobody will hold me to account for my deeds if they become illegal 112 years after my death.
@noseall would you like to upgrade for free all the houses and extensions you built that no longer meet electrical and building control regulations? How very generous that would be.
I'd say being instrumental in the transport of 84, 000 slave, many of whom died, is a lot more than 'having connections to'. Wouldn't you?because he had connections to something which was normal at the time.
I hope none of my deeds will be so horrific that I, or rather my statues, am held to account 112 years after my death.I hope nobody will hold me to account for my deeds if they become illegal 112 years after my death.
What happens when people are frustrated by the 'fillybusters' in the political process, that in effect deny the proper working of the political process?Surely democratic process should prevail? Who decides if something should be changed the elected leaders or the unelected who don't like it. Would I be justified in attacking statues of those who promote the concept of white privilege?
Not that I know of. Only been here a couple of months.Hey, God. Were you previously known on here as 'dontbelieveawordofit' or 'bennymultifinish'?
Did you see the verdict - played out in a British court of law, overseen by a judge and jury. I'm not the anarchist here Woods.an anarchist against the rule of law.