Evidence of AntiSemitism?

[fillyboy]

Like yours, not because it was anti-Semitic.
You can't assume a thread has anti-Semitic posts in it because it's been deleted.

In a thread entirely dedicated to the hatred of Israel I'd say it's a fairly safe assumption.

 

[Odds]

In a thread entirely dedicated to the hatred of Israel I'd say it's a fairly safe assumption.

The thread contained plentiful articles from Jewish opposition parties to Netanyahu in the Knesset and verified observations from israeli human rights groups on illegal Zionist activities on the West Bank.

I can always post more of them if you like.

 

[fillyboy]

The thread contained plentiful articles from Jewish opposition parties to Netanyahu in the Knesset and verified observations from israeli human rights groups on illegal Zionist activities on the West Bank.

I can always post more of them if you like.

Feel free.

 

[MNW67]

The thread about Churchill's statue seems to have been deleted.

 

[King Billy]

In a thread entirely dedicated to the hatred of Israel I'd say it's a fairly safe assumption.

Entirely dedicated to the criticism of Israel still doesn't make it anti-Semitic.

 

[King Billy]

The thread about Churchill's statue seems to have been deleted.

To cover MBK's embarrassment?
He was convinced it was racially aggravated, and that plod was keeping the racially aggravated bit in their back pocket.

 

[MNW67]

To cover MBK's embarrassment?
He was convinced it was racially aggravated, and that plod was keeping the racially aggravated bit in their back pocket.

It depends which words.

For example, in regards to 'Globalise the Intifada':

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other officials have characterised the phrase as a 'call to attack Jewish communities around the world'

 

[Odds]

A definition of Intifada in Arabic is for "a shaking off", referring to uprisings against Israeli control in the West Bank and Gaza. Globalising the term would mean to 'shake off' American domination of the Middle East. To throw off your oppressor can be seen as a noble cause, in their eyes.

It still isn't evidence of antisemitism and i've never used the term.

 

[MNW67]

A definition of Intifada in Arabic is for "a shaking off", referring to uprisings against Israeli control in the West Bank and Gaza. Globalising the term would mean to 'shake off' American domination of the Middle East. To throw off your oppressor can be seen as a noble cause, in their eyes.

It still isn't evidence of antisemitism and i've never used the term.

It was one of the phrases sprayed on the statue. I believe it was the reason that normal criminal damage was turned into racially aggravated criminal damage.

 

[Dec27]

Like yours, not because it was anti-Semitic.
You can't assume a thread has anti-Semitic posts in it because it's been deleted.

Are you still here ?

Do us all a favour, Jog on boy

 

[King Billy]

It depends which words.

For example, in regards to 'Globalise the Intifada':

Probably because one of those few who keep, claiming that criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic, complaining in order to close down any support for Palestinians occupation by Israelis.

 

[King Billy]

A definition of Intifada in Arabic is for "a shaking off", referring to uprisings against Israeli control in the West Bank and Gaza. Globalising the term would mean to 'shake off' American domination of the Middle East. To throw off your oppressor can be seen as a noble cause, in their eyes.

It still isn't evidence of antisemitism and i've never used the term.

I did, and I used it to ask the question, is it racist.
I also looked online and it said it wasn't. It said, as you have suggested, it's purely showing support for Palestinians occupation by Israel.

 

[King Billy]

It was one of the phrases sprayed on the statue. I believe it was the reason that normal criminal damage was turned into racially aggravated criminal damage.

If it's a phrase used in support of Palestinians, how can it possibly be racist?

If I say, "I support the Palestinian struggle against their occupiers", how can it possibly be racist?
Is an occupied people not allowed to struggle against their occupiers?
Or is it only the Palestinians not allowed to struggle against their Israeli occupiers?

By the way, the charge was downgraded to simple criminal damage. So the support for Palestinians phrase was not considered racist.

 

[motorbiking]

The thread about Churchill's statue seems to have been deleted.

funny that.

 

[King Billy]

funny that.

The Israeli-genocide supporters have their way in shuting down support for Palestinians. Starmers wife is Jewish, Funny that.

Whether the phrase "globalise the intifada" is considered racist is a subject of intense debate, with opinions often divided between viewing it as a call for violence against Jewish people and interpreting it as a call for resistance against oppression.

• Viewpoint as Racist/Antisemitic: Many, including Jewish organizations and law enforcement officials, view the phrase as antisemitic. They argue that "intifada"—Arabic for "shaking off" or "uprising"—is historically associated with violent attacks on civilians during the first and second Palestinian intifadas. Consequently"globalise the intifada" is interpreted by many as a call to spread violence against Jews and Israelis worldwide. In the UK, police have announced that using this phrase could lead to arrests for stirring up racial hatred.
• Viewpoint as Political Speech: Conversely, many pro-Palestinian activists and supporters argue that the phrase is not aimed at Jewish people. They interpret it as a call for international solidarity, boycotts, and civil disobedience to protest against Israeli policies and occupation. Some argue that "intifada" is a legitimate term for resistance against colonial domination and that restricting its use is a form of repression that limits free speech.
• Context and Legal Actions: The phrase has led to legal and social controversy, with some jurisdictions, such as in New South Wales, Australia, considering bans on it as part of measures to combat hate speech. Police in the UK and Australia have warned that the phrase can incite hatred and have begun treating it as a, potentially, criminal offense in certain contexts.

Ultimately, for many, the phrase is deeply offensive and dangerous, while for others, it is a rallying cry for justice and resistance.

For me it is a show of support for Palestinian struggle against their oppressors.