hi guys just want your opinion on the following;
i've been working in plumbing for a few years for my father in law and am begining to pick some work up of my own which is great but obviously comes with more responsibilty.i'm half way thru a job which began as just replacing tanks in the loft.when i inspected the f+e tank it was bone dry,the ball valve had seized and the feed pipe had blocked up.after seeing this and futher inspection of the system i advised a powerflush which the customer accepted and then said he wanted all the hot water pipe work re-routed.weighing up the amount of work to be done i suggested the customer consider installing a combi since i would be doing most of the work involved anyway and that the boiler 10years old + although working fine at moment may need replacing in the future and so extra cost would even out over time.i tryed to steer him for this option believing it to be the best value for money for him but he decided to keep his boiler cos it was still working fine.so i've flushed swapped tanks and changed pipe workbut just discovered hw cylinder scaled up and resticting the cold feed into it giving poor pressure hence more work and more money.my question is does my relative inexperience in running the job mean that although having the best intentions,i've been neglegent and cost the customer more money.the way see it he could have had a new combi boiler for roughly the same money,whereas now he'll be looking on replacing the existing not too long off.shouldi probed him more on the history of he system,exactley want wrk he wanted done ,steered him harder to the course of action i felt most appropriate???
cheers for taking the time to reading
i've been working in plumbing for a few years for my father in law and am begining to pick some work up of my own which is great but obviously comes with more responsibilty.i'm half way thru a job which began as just replacing tanks in the loft.when i inspected the f+e tank it was bone dry,the ball valve had seized and the feed pipe had blocked up.after seeing this and futher inspection of the system i advised a powerflush which the customer accepted and then said he wanted all the hot water pipe work re-routed.weighing up the amount of work to be done i suggested the customer consider installing a combi since i would be doing most of the work involved anyway and that the boiler 10years old + although working fine at moment may need replacing in the future and so extra cost would even out over time.i tryed to steer him for this option believing it to be the best value for money for him but he decided to keep his boiler cos it was still working fine.so i've flushed swapped tanks and changed pipe workbut just discovered hw cylinder scaled up and resticting the cold feed into it giving poor pressure hence more work and more money.my question is does my relative inexperience in running the job mean that although having the best intentions,i've been neglegent and cost the customer more money.the way see it he could have had a new combi boiler for roughly the same money,whereas now he'll be looking on replacing the existing not too long off.shouldi probed him more on the history of he system,exactley want wrk he wanted done ,steered him harder to the course of action i felt most appropriate???
cheers for taking the time to reading