Farage

[motorbiking]

Vague and meaningless waffle is very popular among the pro-Farage campaigners.

So you don’t think he has a damaged claim?

I welcome your analysis and rational thinking setting out why.

 

[blup]

This was a monumental backfire for Coutts.

Nope, just unnecessarily succumbing to political pressure, over at most a technical breach of personal data which only disclosed the fact of his membership not how much he had in his account. Using your argument that he was not exited for commercial reasons, no breach there either.

Blup

 

[JohnD]

So you don’t think he has a damaged claim?

I welcome your analysis and rational thinking setting out why.

I have asked you to say what claim you believe he has.

You haven't.

If and when you set forward your belief, I may comment on it.

 

[motorbiking]

Who made you teacher qualified to mark my homework?

Blup seems happy to engage and challenge the arguments. You simply pretend not to understand

 

[JohnD]

Well that's funny.

A few minutes ago you invited me to comment.

So you don’t think he has a damaged claim?

I welcome your analysis and rational thinking setting out why.

But the idea of expressing yourself in anything other than vague smears alarms you.

Who made you teacher qualified to mark my homework?

No sign of analysis or rational thinking from you. Just flannel.

 

[motorbiking]

Nope, just unnecessarily succumbing to political pressure, over at most a technical breach of personal data which only disclosed the fact of his membership not how much he had in his account. Using your argument that he was not exited for commercial reasons, no breach there either.

Blup

She has admitted being the source of a leak of confidential data. According to most of the press. I haven’t seen the confession.

A breach of confidentiality occurs if there is an obligation to keep data confidential- there was, the person should know that they are discussing information based on access to such confidential information. They share information that relies on knowledge of that confidential information. That is a breach.

E.g. “obviously I can’t disclose his bank balance, but suffice it to say..he no longer meets the commercial criteria to bank with us”. That is a breach.

“NF claims you debanked him based on his views and politics”. No it was purely commercial grounds. We don’t debank people based on their views”. That was defamatory

 

[JohnD]

...confidential data. ....

breach of confidentiality,

Let me check. What was the confidential data that the bank disclosed, that had not previously been publicised by Farage?

What damage did the bank do to him?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You seem to be thrashing about this morning in the vain hope you might hang onto some credibility but it all went wrong when you lost control of your brief.

So no facts, just trying to avoid your claim?

 

[gant]

What facts have you in mind?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

What facts have you in mind?

Any would do. You made the claim

 

[gant]

What claim?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

What claim?

If you've no idea of the claim you made without facts, what have you been wittering on about trying to say I'm wrong.

Clueless. Proven.

 

[gant]

It's you who keeps wittering on about Farages commercial account not having enough funds for Coutts.
It's quite obvious from the facts in the public domain that this wasn't issue in his account being closed. You for some reason keep proffering it up, perhaps you could explain why you keep proffering it up, beyond my comprehension.
As I've said before there are more serious issues and connotations to take into account in this affair and Farages account and how it's been dealt with have revealed this.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

It's you who keeps wittering on about Farages commercial account not having enough funds for Coutts.
It's quite obvious from the facts in the public domain that this wasn't issue in his account being closed. You for some reason keep proffering it up, perhaps you could explain why you keep proffering it up, beyond my comprehension.
As I've said before there are more serious issues and connotations to take into account in this affair and Farages account and how it's been dealt with have revealed this.

It's fairly simple. It's part of coutts terms.
Part of the overall position. Farage himself agrees he doesn't meet their financial requirement terms.

Easier just to ignore it because if doesn't suit ?

But nothing to do with your baseless claim. Any facts yet, or agree it was baseless.

 

[gant]

It's not the story, you think it is so it's an impasse.