Last edited:
Greenland Vs NATO
- Thread starter Highway Man
- Start date
I've been reading a discussion on Reddit with people who seem to know a lot more about this. The US were totally on board throughout. It is just a stupid game from Trump. Basically, saying what I have said all along i.e. there is absolutely no chance that two different US administrations would let us deal with one of their most important military and intelligence assets without them being in charge of the process every step of the way. One of the reasons is that it suits them for the base to be extra territorial; think rendition.
Guantanamo?, I read something similar on Mumsnet.
As long as Reddit agrees, we are all safe.
The logic is inescapable, though, for anyone who cares to spend a moment applying their mind. When you understand how important this base is to the USA, and the history of how it came to be built. Only an idiot would still believe that they weren't in charge of this all along. We are just carrying water for them, as we have done countless times since WWII.
Enlighten me please ?
The suggestion that the USA, under two different Presidents, didn't take their own legal advice about one of their most important strategic assets is infantile in the extreme.
