You are comparing totally different situations. Imagine China had threatened to invade the UK unless we sold our country to them. In that context, 'Britain is for the British' would have a very different meaning.
Last edited:
Has Trump Finally Lost His Marbles?
- Thread starter securespark
- Start date
You are comparing totally different situations. Imagine China had threatened to invade the UK unless we sold our country to them. In that context, 'Britain is for the British' would have a very different meaning.
Hmmmmmm.
He's either trolling or genuinely dumb.
I'm sorry there are Trump hornsmokers even in the UK.
Trump apologists sure are staying silent about it.
See above.
OK, dipstick - what race is a muslim?
I'm flattered that you feel the need to spend your time going through my old posts to try to catch me out.
However your efforts failed spectacularly. Yes, I do occasionally resort to purile insults - but only after someone has insulted me first.
When I was typing my previous post, I knew that someone was going to try what you've just done. I would have put money on it. All because those on the left don't see the whole picture and ignore the wrongdoings of their fellow left-wingers. And liberals are so predictable.
Nice try. Better luck next time.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 5,143
- Reaction score
- 633
- Country
Yes, I do occasionally resort to purile insults - but only after someone has insulted me first.
That makes it alright, does it?
OK.
Not necessarily. It just means that occasionally I allow myself to be lowered to the level of left-wing liberals when provoked.
Same as if someone punches me in the face, I will do the same to the aggressor.
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 5,143
- Reaction score
- 633
- Country
Every single one where somebody has applauded him. Every one.
Yes they are. Everybody who excuses Trump for anything is excusing him for those comments. Everybody.
You see this, is what he IS
I was in Helmand with UK troops. Draft 'dodger' Trump's words are a gut punch to families of those killed
Donald Trump has claimed NATO troops stayed "a little off the front lines" in Afghanistan. It's hard to know whether he's ignorant or just doesn't really care.
Trump 'wrong' to claim Nato troops avoided Afghanistan front line, Downing Street says
The US president says Nato troops stayed "a little off the front lines" - despite 457 UK military deaths in the conflict.
www.bbc.co.uk
It's not just one thing he has done, which you can balance against other things - it is his intrinsic being, it is his essence, it is him through and through, it is the type of man he is.
You can't separate it out, you can't pick and choose some select things - it's all or it is nothing.
If you say you like something he does, you're saying you like what he said about our troops in Afghanistan. You really are.
If you say you want him to do something he does, you're saying you want him to say what he did about our troops in Afghanistan. You really are.
FGS wake up and realise WHAT HE IS.
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 5,143
- Reaction score
- 633
- Country
Can ReganAndCarter on this site communicate his feelings when "provoked" without insulting other forum users, or does he need to do this to try to hide his inadequacy and lack of any sensible viewpoint?
Same as if someone punches me in the face, I will do the same to the aggressor.
Does insulting people dissuade them from insulting you again?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,656
- Reaction score
- 5,720
- Country
You seem to struggle with the idea that people can acknowledge what he is good at, while at the same time not support the decisions he makes.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,656
- Reaction score
- 5,720
- Country
getting what he wants.
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 5,143
- Reaction score
- 633
- Country
Go on then - point out the factual errors in the article I linked to.
You know you want to, so go on then, do it.
I'm sure they do, but then there are lots of people with an inadequate grasp of the realities of the situation.
And as for Starmer -
On 3 November 2022, it was announced that the United Kingdom and Mauritius had decided to begin negotiations on sovereignty over the BIOT, taking into account the recent international legal proceedings.
Care to tell us who was PM on 3 November 2022?
On 3 October 2024, the UK and Mauritius issued a joint statement, affirming Mauritius' sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago while granting the UK continued control over Diego Garcia for 99 years.
How likely do you think it that the agreement was pretty much done and dusted by 5 July 2024? You're a man with an impressive grasp of geopolitical realities, and a deep understanding of how quickly treaty negotiations can be stopped, started, or pivoted, so you tell us.
