Well we possibly could but someone's put a restriction on that to stop us being overly nosey outside our test-tube, or theyre keen to see how long it takes us to find an answer, as the saying goes (something like!) if we can imagine it we normally end up achieving it.Hard to fathom that the universe is infinitely endless. Something can travel for ever and never hit a brick wall dead end.
Hard to fathom that the universe is infinitely endless. Something can travel for ever and never hit a brick wall dead end.
Present theory suggests the universe is finite.
What does the theory suggest is at the end?
That is not correct.The boundary is constantly expanding, and at a rate so fast that the light from the boundary will never reach us, thus we can never observe it.
Why should there be anything at the end.
It's the same question as to what was there before the moment of the Big Bang.
The boundary is constantly expanding, and at a rate so fast that the light from the boundary will never reach us, thus we can never observe it.
That is not correct.
But if a theory suggests the universe is finite, then it must also state that there is some sort of end. Otherwise it would be infinite.
Or does their theory also go on to say that if infinity cannot be proven, then it must be finite.
Ok. I will say I thought you meant the objects at 13.8 billion light years.
Has anyone satisfactorily explained how - given that nothing can travel anywhere near the speed of light - objects at a distance of 13.8 billion light years have had time to get there?
Has anyone satisfactorily explained how - given that nothing can travel anywhere near the speed of light - objects at a distance of 13.8 billion light years have had time to get there?