I told you!

[johnny2007]

Today, outside Richmond station.
Face recognition for what???
The sleepy cops in large numbers there couldn't answer this question in any understandable language.
This is another step towards full control from your beloved politicians.
Digital ID anyone?
I told you!

 

[motorbiking]

The get out is that its optional for you to pass through the scan. I'm not sure that is entirely accurate given how its set up.

 

[Notch7]

Face recognition for what???

it seems Johnny is against ways to stop crime

funny that successive Conservative governments expanded facial recognition............but not a peep out of Johnny then

 

[johnny2007]

The get out is that its optional for you to pass through the scan. I'm not sure that is entirely accurate given how its set up.

There was no scan, just lots of cameras planted on the street.
No way to avoid them.
Many covered their faces.

it seems Johnny is against ways to stop crime

funny that successive Conservative governments expanded facial recognition............but not a peep out of Johnny then

View attachment 400315

That's how they sold it to fools like you.
"We're doing this to stop crime".
But then they refuse to act when crimes are being committed (burglaries anyone?)
"It's for your own good"...
Now, when did I hear this before???
Oh, and BTW, left, right and centre are all in bed together on this one.

 

[ajrtd]

The get out is that its optional for you to pass through the scan. I'm not sure that is entirely accurate given how its set up.

I saw a video where someone tried that and a couple of coppers stopped him to take his photo. They weren't interested in his argument about facial recognition.

 

[Koolpc]

Its two tier policing.

Would they ask a Burqa wearer to remove it?

 

[motorbiking]

and of course the criminals have face coverings.

Sec 172 of the Road Traffic act, was sold to the public on the argument that criminals refuse to say who was driving the car following a hit and run. Turns out it's now used for mass automatic prosecutions.

 

[noseall]

. Turns out it's now used for mass automatic prosecutions.

Shocking that police are using advances in technology rather than just blurry images and the honesty of motorists. How dare they!

 

[IT Minion]

and of course the criminals have face coverings.

Sec 172 of the Road Traffic act, was sold to the public on the argument that criminals refuse to say who was driving the car following a hit and run. Turns out it's now used for mass automatic prosecutions.

... Prosecutions of criminals?

 

[Odds]

View attachment 400314

Today, outside Richmond station.
Face recognition for what???
The sleepy cops in large numbers there couldn't answer this question in any understandable language.
This is another step towards full control from your beloved politicians.
Digital ID anyone?
I told you!

 

[Notch7]

That's how they sold it to fools like you.

So what are they doing for?

 

[johnny2007]

So what are they doing for?

Control.
The final aim is to control all of us like the do in china or Korea.
You will have carbon credits thanks to your beloved climate change.
You won't be a ble to eat certain type of food as often as you want.
Your bank account might be frozen at any time.
There won't be any cash to spend if that happens.
All your movements will be easily traced by AI and you won't be able to go wherever you want.
This is another conspiracy theory, same as the lockdown, the recession, migration and various wars started for profit.

 

[IT Minion]

This is another conspiracy theory

Correct.

 

[noseall]

Control.
The final aim is to control all of us like the do in china or Korea.

…and Trumps’ USA.

Were you expecting everyone else on the planet to benefit from tech and the rozzers say no thanks?

 

[Odds]

Will it be seen as a bad thing when used to prevent a terrorist attack?
I think not.