Because they haven't entered into a contract
Knows the cost of everything, and the worth of nothing.
Because they haven't entered into a contract
Money worshipers despise ex-wives.Knows the cost of everything, and the worth of nothing.
Money worshipers despise ex-wives.

what piece of paper did you have in mind?You mean that pointless piece of paper which does not discern between the financial contributions of married or unmarried couples sharing everything but only penalising the unmarried victims?
Gotcha.
Glad to see that the law will recognise the efforts of unmarried contributors now.

do you think you should be bound by contracts you haven't entered into?Knows the cost of everything, and the worth of nothing.
The one that says- I’ve contributed loads financially, whist we were together but under previous law I would leave the relationship with nothing, but now thanks to new legislation I will be recognised and be financially recompensed for my efforts - piece of paper.what piece of paper did you have in mind?
pointless waffle

That is not currently the caseThe one that says- I’ve contributed loads financially, whist we were together but under previous law I would leave the relationship with nothing, but now thanks to new legislation I will be recognised and be financially recompensed for my efforts - piece of paper.
![]()

what is the "worth" of a relationship that has ended?Knows the cost of everything, and the worth of nothing.
That is not currently the case
Ask your ex.what is the "worth" of a relationship that has ended?

It is not currently the case that a person who "contributed loads financially, whist [they] were together but under previous law would leave the relationship with nothing".Yes I know. You would have exploded by now, if the legislation had been mandated into UK law.
and a clause in the draft legislation nullifying them.Interestingly there is a paragraph in the consultation document called “cohabitation agreements” .![]()
Actually it's not an 'explicit agreement' to 'share everything'...Because they haven't entered into a contract. Marriage is a contract, an explicit agreement to share everything.
Can you think of other contracts that you haven't agreed to, explicitly or implicitly that can bind you?
You mean like staying at home and raising children means a person has 'contributed nothing'?The Government's proposal is those who have contributed nothing can make a claim.

Actually it's not an 'explicit agreement' to 'share everything'...
Otherwise why do you think divorce courts/lawyers exist?
So there goes your argument!
No.You mean like staying at home and raising children means a person has 'contributed nothing'?
So according to you that only applies to married couples...Marriage is the joining of two people - everything generated during the marriage irrespective of effort, financial contribution etc is considered a marital asset.
No.