ICE told to get the eff out

Those shots are very selective, to the point of misleading.

The wheels were turned to the left, or at least straight when she accelerated. If the road hadn't been icy she'd have run him down. But the wheels span on the ice, then she turned right, got some grip on the ice and the car started moving.

It was attempted murder by the driver, who got shot in self-defence.

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

That's how you're supposed to do a three point turn in order to avoid "dry steering".
 
I don't remember anyone pointing a gun at me while telling me to stop during my driving test.

Now you're just being childish because I pointed out that you don't know how to drive properly.

If you don't know what dry steering is, you can always Google it.
 
So, in your parallel universe where she was behaving perfectly logically and the cop didn't shoot...

Would it be a good defence for her to say she ran over the copper who was pointing a gun because he happened to be in the way of where her steering was pointing?
 
My God the level of naivety being shown by the usual suspects is absolutely astonishing, suggest you look beyond your Daily Mail and BBC news sources and get a grip with what's really happening in parts of the US now.
 
My God the level of naivety being shown by the usual suspects is absolutely astonishing, suggest you look beyond your Daily Mail and BBC news sources and get a grip with what's really happening in parts of the US now.
Which is? Pray tell oh mighty one, the Daily Wail doesn't say.

I've seen that Trump is enforcing border control. Like every country used to, including ours.
 
So, in your parallel universe where she was behaving perfectly logically and the cop didn't shoot...

Would it be a good defence for her to say she ran over the copper who was pointing a gun because he happened to be in the way of where her steering was pointing?

No idea what that means.

But she was driving perfectly. She tickled the throttle before turning the steering wheel. The wheels spun slightly on the ice. But in bizarro Trump fan boy world, apparently this means that she was trying to kill somebody.
 
More of us should be. What happens next in Iran has the potential to bring some sort of lasting peace in the Middle East.
I can see some kind of Iran/isreal alliance emerging however unlikely that may seem but the jury is out on the rest of the region. Trumpf has a history of not following through on his promises of supply. Remember what happened to the revolution Bushsenior encouraged after Irack 1?
I must admit, I hadn't realised until yesterday how heavily intertwined Venezuela was with Iran and Hezbollah.
Russsia is an ally of both Irann and Isreal as far as I can see, so it gets complicated enforcing against the shadow oil fleets.
 
Come on, you're arguing nonsense now. You'd "tickle" the throttle while someone is standing in front of your bumper?

Stop being silly. She carried out a very slow and perfectly controlled three point turn, and she did it by the book. Only Trump fan boy nutters think this makes her a terrorist trying to mow down law officers. I don't know how she managed to execute it so well with three men with guns screaming at her and bashing on her car.
 
Last edited:
If she really was driving away from them then she'd have been in reverse.
She was doing a three point turn in accordance with an instruction to gtfo. If anything its a sign of her innocence/ naivety that she didn’t reverse.
It's easy to criticise on the basis of frame-by-frame analysis. If the cop had the abililty to freeze time I'm sure he would have. But if I was him, with a gun pointing at someone who's driving at them, resisting arrest, then it should be obvious that she would end up getting shot.
Plenty of alternatives. She was scared, the shooter was calm and calculated
 
Back
Top