Nonsense. They had no grounds to arrest that woman for obstruction, in her car.It's clear that her actions were an attempt to obstruct or interfere - they have laws against that.
Nonsense. They had no grounds to arrest that woman for obstruction, in her car.It's clear that her actions were an attempt to obstruct or interfere - they have laws against that.

Which bit of "you've already dismissed it" don't you understand?OK, at least you are trying to answer the question now.
So, when does she try to block the path of the ICE agent(s) with her car. Do you have some evidence. That's all I have been asking for.
Good old Emily from The Heritage Foundation.

They could have easily popped round her house later and arrested her, they had her plates. She'd still be alive today, unfortunately that didn't happen. It's sad and wrong that she was shot assisting her gobby tw*t of a wife. That doesn't make the shooting unlawful.Nonsense. They had no grounds to arrest that woman for obstruction, in her car.
It was the multiple armed masked males attack along with the trying to open her car door along with the reaching into her vehicle and then the three shots at point blank range along with the "effing bítch", that I'm struggling with.They could have easily popped round her house later and arrested her, they had her plates. She'd still be alive today, unfortunately that didn't happen. It's sad and wrong that she was shot assisting her gobby tw*t of a wife. That doesn't make the shooting unlawful.

Lets break it down:It was the multiple armed masked males attack along with the trying to open her car door along with the reaching into her vehicle and then the three shots at point blank range along with the "effing bítch", that I'm struggling with.
Which bit of "you've already dismissed it" don't you understand?
See this opinion:

`Absolutely bang on the mark with that assessment.Good old Emily from The Heritage Foundation.
At least Trump lies with his stage make-up on.

No she hasn't, she is right and you are wrong,It was the multiple armed masked males attack along with the trying to open her car door along with the reaching into her vehicle and then the three shots at point blank range along with the "effing bítch", that I'm struggling with.
Emily from The Heritage Foundation, seems to have missed those bits.

I'm not responsible for your learning.You seem to be swerving to a different question which I didn't ask you.
Probable cause for obstruction of justiceJust to remind you, we were talking about what grounds they had to try to arrest her.
No I said that her actions would give the officer grounds for arrestYou said that she had committed an offence by obstructing them with her car.
You imaged this.You said you were going to provide some evidence
. But instead you have pointed at the answer to a completely different question.
What was the purpose of her parking her car across the street? Could a reasonable person interpret this as a possible attempt to cause an obstruction? Who was the likely target of that obstruction? Does that give grounds to suspect felony obstruction of justice?
Irrelevant. They masked men have no right to arrest her, enter her vehicle or try to open her car door.Lets break it down:
multiple armed masked males
ICE officers with POLICE on their uniforms. She knew who they were and why they were there.
She lives there. They don't.She herself appears to have been there because they were there, she is alleged to have been a member of an anti-ICE acvivist group called Monarca and her self appointed role has been to observe ICE activities. There is no credibility in the argument that she thought she was about to get kidnapped or carjacked, by masked men.
Telling her to stop what exactly?telling her to stop and trying to get her to do so.
Not now she is dead no. I'm sure he lawyers will replay that misogynistic hatred bit over and over though.and then the three shots at point blank range
they shot her yes
the "effing bítch"
doesn't really alter anything.
Nonsense.Probable cause for obstruction of justice

You are not anywhere near the truth with this one, I would imagine you be the type to think you could do exactly what she was doing then crying over it afterwards. In this country you don't get shot, in the USA you most certainly run that risk. Even running away from the police can get you shot never mind ramming your car into one whilst trying to leave and ignore their orders.Irrelevant. They masked men have no right to arrest her, enter her vehicle or try to open her car door.
She lives there. They don't.
Telling her to stop what exactly?
Telling you say? You don't tell someone anything by reaching into their car window and trying to open their door, other than 'you are being attacked'.
Not now she is dead no. I'm sure he lawyers will replay that misogynistic hatred bit over and over though.