ICE told to get the eff out

Bear in mind that there is a difference between a crime being committed and the administration actually agreeing to prosecute it.
I will bare this in mind, I am trying to find my barristers wig and gown to wear as I write my summary as I feel it is only right in doing so.
 
There are two arguments being put forward by his defenders, I think. The one I am looking at here is the one which says that, when the car first set off forwards, the killer did not know that it was actually going to be turning right or that it would be going quite slowly. The argument is that, for all knew, Renee might floor the throttle and drive straight at him. As a result, he only had a fraction of a second to make a decision.
His ptsd kicked, he thought “I’m not going to be dragged down the road again” so he shot her. Unfit to be in post, and certainly should have been off sick.
 
His ptsd kicked, he thought “I’m not going to be dragged down the road again” so he shot her. Unfit to be in post, and certainly should have been off sick.
medical evidence of that or is this just your opinion? `even if that was the case then he is justified in his actions through fear of his and others safety.
 
It looked like she was ready to pull across the path of whoever she wanted to stop,
I think she was getting ready to leave when a car pulled out of her blind spot at the side of the road, which caused her to brake, and then the next vehicle was full of thugs! And we have all seen what happened next.
 
“I’m not going to be dragged down the road again”
Its a well-known fact, cars can be weaponised, and this guy has recent experience of this happening. So why would he do it again? especially when its against training? And dare I say it, common sense! The guy is a nutter...
 
Back
Top