ICE told to get the eff out

MNW67 said:
Bear in mind that there is a difference between a crime being committed and the administration actually agreeing to prosecute it.
Click to expand...
I will bare this in mind, I am trying to find my barristers wig and gown to wear as I write my summary as I feel it is only right in doing so.
 
MNW67 said:
There are two arguments being put forward by his defenders, I think. The one I am looking at here is the one which says that, when the car first set off forwards, the killer did not know that it was actually going to be turning right or that it would be going quite slowly. The argument is that, for all knew, Renee might floor the throttle and drive straight at him. As a result, he only had a fraction of a second to make a decision.
Click to expand...
His ptsd kicked, he thought “I’m not going to be dragged down the road again” so he shot her. Unfit to be in post, and certainly should have been off sick.
 
blup said:
His ptsd kicked, he thought “I’m not going to be dragged down the road again” so he shot her. Unfit to be in post, and certainly should have been off sick.
Click to expand...
medical evidence of that or is this just your opinion? `even if that was the case then he is justified in his actions through fear of his and others safety.
 
Ivor Windybottom said:
It looked like she was ready to pull across the path of whoever she wanted to stop,
Click to expand...
I think she was getting ready to leave when a car pulled out of her blind spot at the side of the road, which caused her to brake, and then the next vehicle was full of thugs! And we have all seen what happened next.
 
blup said:
“I’m not going to be dragged down the road again”
Click to expand...
Its a well-known fact, cars can be weaponised, and this guy has recent experience of this happening. So why would he do it again? especially when its against training? And dare I say it, common sense! The guy is a nutter...
 
Ivor Windybottom said:
I can't be bothered to read the last ten pages.

Has everyone had a good logical discussion and all agreed a sensible conclusion yet?
Click to expand...

The sensible conclusion is that there are people here who think that Trump's Protection Squadron can do no wrong.

The more viciously violent and murderous they become, the more some people here support them.

And do you know why? The clue is in the first word in the official name of the Protection Squadron.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that they can do, no limit on the number of people they can gun down, which will give these supporters pause for thought, because anything, absolutely anything, is OK if it is anti-immigrant.
 
morqthana said:
The sensible conclusion is that there are people here who think that Trump's Protection Squadron can do no wrong.

The more viciously violent and murderous they become, the more some people here support them.

And do you know why? The clue is in the first word in the official name of the Protection Squadron.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that they can do, no limit on the number of people they can gun down, which will give these supporters pause for thought, because anything, absolutely anything, is OK if it is anti-immigrant.
Click to expand...
How many have they gunned down?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Agile
A mature (over 40) lady gets pulled over for speeding...
2
Replies
17
Views
4K
John506
J
T
Personallity transplant?
Replies
9
Views
1K
TexMex
T
B
Useless Police..No wonder they can't catch Criminals!!
2
Replies
28
Views
2K
pete01
pete01
HOGGY952
Brave Man Jokes
Replies
5
Views
2K
HOGGY952
HOGGY952
empip
Oldsters
Replies
2
Views
695
JohnD
JohnD
Back
Top