Killing her was justified by her actions of driving her car at the agent
Except that she didn't.
Killing her was justified by her actions of driving her car at the agent

He suffered internal bleeding* as a result of injuries.Except that she didn't.
It was difficult to tell he was injured as he gleefully skipped down the road after he murdered the effing beehatch. But you are right, a bruise should be taken seriously. Especially when your victim has lost all her blood.He suffered internal bleeding* as a result of injuries.
![]()
ICE officer who shot Renee Nicole Good suffered internal bleeding, feds say
The federal immigration officer who fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good experienced internal injuries, the Department of Homeland Security said.eu.usatoday.com
*a haematoma or bruise is technically internal bleeding.

As people do with broken bones and ruptured organs, when high on adrenaline.It was difficult to tell he was injured as he gleefully skipped down the road after he murdered the effing beehatch. But you are right, a bruise should be taken seriously. Especially when your victim has lost all her blood.
As people do when they are not in any pain too.As people do with broken bones and ruptured organs, when high on adrenaline.

Thats the point of adrenaline.As people do when they are not in any pain too.
Not even a limp or a grimace.
Why did they choose to walk down the road and persecute an innocent woman? Perhaps being female had something to do with it? It'll be interesting as to why the officers chose to obstruct and interfere with the day to day lives of those women.I have now been thinking this through. I have tried to work out what might have been going on in the agents' heads:
Outside a suburban house in Minneapolis, two ICE agents are busy checking passports. They are exceedingly bored.
A1 ‘You see that car over there’
A2 ‘The one in the distance, pipping its horn?’
A1 ‘Yes, the purple one. Is it obstructing us’
A2 ‘No, it’s miles away”
A1 ‘Do you think the driver is attempting to obstruct us’
A2 ‘She’d have to be an idiot to think that. She’s only blocking one lane and the traffic is flowing fine’
A1 ‘Can you think of another reason why she would be parked like that’
A2 ‘Well no, not really’
A1 ‘I studied law decades ago. Could we possibly argue that, because we can’t think of another reason that she might be parked there, she must be attempting to obstruct us’
A2 ‘You mean, even though she isn’t actually obstructing us and only an idiot would think being parked like that could possibly obstruct us.’
A1 ‘Still, I think the law is clear. If we can’t come up with another reason for her to be parked like that, we can only assume that she must be attempting to obstruct us.'
A2 ‘Let’s go and get her then. It will be a lot more fun than checking passports.’

Well she got shot in doing so. I don't think there is any argument there.Except that she didn't.
Tribalism of the Trumpists vs rational thought of the restSadly tribalism conquers thinking for some.
She did something called driving, it what roads are for. The agent who told her to gtfo intentionally or otherwise set her up to be shot.No he **** her for driving her car at him and accelerating towards him
If your car was ticketed by a traffic warden just as you returned a few minutes over the allotted time, would you expect to be shot for challenging their actions? It was a traffic regulation incident treated as terrorism.Maybe she didnt know what an ICE agent was?
As I wouldn't have, I would have drove off aswell.

Your opinion of the event which doesn't mean that it is correct. It may look like that by sheer coincidence and no setup involved.She did something called driving, it what roads are for. The agent who told her to gtfo intentionally or otherwise set her up to be shot.

Yes when told not to and to also get out of her car. she then decided to drive and then accelerate towards the officer. Not a sensible choice.She did something called driving,
